Page 115 - Today’s Business Communication; A How-to Guide for the Modern Professional
P. 115

104   TODAY’S BUSINESS COMMUNICATION

                as well as maintain a good relationship with him or her. Further, if you
                are sending a transmittal memo with a quarterly earnings report to the
                C-level managers, you are attempting to influence those senior executives
                in such a way as they can trust the accuracy of your numbers.
                   Since the days of the Classical Greek and Roman scholars, people
                have been interested in the most effective ways to persuade and influence
                others. Therefore, there is no surprise that scholars today are still study-
                ing the topics, while practitioners employ various techniques to influence
                or persuade. Before we delve into theory and techniques, let’s spend a
                moment reflecting on the meaning of persuasion and influence. In this
                chapter, you’ll notice that we use influence and persuasion interchange-
                ably, but that approach lacks a certain amount of precision.
                   Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary provides this definition of influ-
                ence:  the power or capacity of causing an effect in indirect or intangible
                ways� It gives the following definition for persuasion: the act or process
                or an instance of persuading; and, finally, defines persuasion as to move by
                argument, entreaty, or expostulation to a belief, position or course of action�
                You can see that influence and persuasion are related much as a mother is
                related to her child.
                   While we mentioned the Classical Greeks and Romans who stud-
                ied persuasion, we won’t spend time  rehashing ancient  history. How-
                ever, one contemporary model of persuasion comes to us from Petty and
                Cacioppo’s  Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM). The reason we men-
                         1
                tion this model is, in part, because it has been broadly and frequently
                used in empirical research studies across several disciplines, including
                communication and psychology.
                   At its most basic, the ELM demonstrates (see Figure 8.1) that there
                are two routes to persuasion through argumentation: central and periph-
                eral. The central route requires substantial cognitive processing, what we
                might call careful thought. You could think of it as a more data-driven
                approach. A strong argument, backed up with strong evidence—numbers
                for example—should lead to a stronger persuasive effect. The peripheral
                route requires less cognitive, careful thought. You might think of it as
                an emotionally driven approach. A beautiful person, presenting a weak
                argument—without any evidence for example—should lead to a weaker
                persuasive effect. Believe it or not, research indicates that beautiful people
   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120