Page 160 - INDONESIA ISLAMIC CULTURE
P. 160

Between Creatures and the   Sufism. However a problem quickly arose   only intense theological debates took   this issue took place in the 16  century.
                                                                            th
 Creator  when the concept of “knowing self” had   place (that are still in progress) and many   Hamzah Fansuri  was the torchbearer
                                                                12
 It was once assumed that the mystical   to be formulated. How should the Hadith   types of mystical orders sprung up; the   12.  Hamzah Fansuri came from Barus, on the west
 tradition or more precisely, the Sufi   Qudsi that says kuntu kanzan makhfiyyan   penetration of mystical thought into the   coast of northern Sumatra. There is no genuine
                                                 source that offers direct information about this
 tradition in the Islamic world was directly   an-u’rafa (I am the hidden treasure,   philosophical world of other religions   brilliant Sufi-poet, but experts tried to find it by
 influenced by Hellenism that had been   happy to be known) be interpreted?   sometimes occurred as well.  critically studying his writings. However, different
                                                 interpretations were inevitable, like the Prophet,
 parts of ideas. The spread of Islam to   Everything is perceived as a mystery. In   Sufism, as the intensification of the   who was not liked by Iskandar Muda, for his daring
 Persia, which had embraced Hellenism   what way can “the hidden” and “happy to   service of God is an attempt to achieve   to reprimand loudly. Could Hamzah Fansuri, who
 through the conquest of Alexander the   be known” be approached? Sufis were   the highest level of gnosis, the most   refused to go to the palace of the Shah-e-nadi?
                                                 Brakel said that the place could only have been in
 Great and the Persian influence in the   well aware of Allah’s warnings in the   perfect mystical level, when the “self”   Aceh, as it is also mentioned in the Hikayat Aceh.
 history of Islamic thought seemed to   Qur’an (QS. Al-Hadid/57: 16) that say:   has dissolved into a feeling of unity with   But Drewes was adamant that it was the capital of
 justify this assumption. Moreover, the   “Has the time not come for those who   the Divine. But what does participation   Old Siam. On one thing they all agreed and that is
                                                 that Fansuri came from Barus. “Hamzah Barus in
 debate between man’s aspiration as   believe that their hearts should humbly   mean in this unity with the Divine? This   the Malay country/precisely Kapur in timber/......”)
 the “creation” or the “emanation” of the   submit to be mindful of Allah and the   was the starting point of a debate ---is   (Quoted in Iskandar, 1965). But was he born there?
                                                 The first difference appeared in al-Attas (1969) and
 Highest Essence also ravaged Sufi   truth of the revelation that has been sent   it unity of existence (wujud), essence   (1970: 4- 8), in which he said no, he was born in
 thought. In fact, some say that it is rooted   down? And let them not emulate those   (dhat), or vision (shuhud)? The wahdat   Sharnawi, based on the poem:
 in thoughts that developed in India.   to whom the Scripture was delivered   al-wujud (the unity of existence) negates   Hamzah whose origin is Fansuri
                                                    Came into existence on the soil of Sharnawi
 However, a distinction must be made   earlier, whose hearts, after a long period   the existence of reality, because it is   “Wujud” (lit. existence), according to al-Attas, has
 between a possible acculturation process   had become heavy and many of them   incorporated in the “unity of existence”   to be interpreted as physical existence, so it means
                                                 to be born. But Brakel (1969), and Drewes and
 and the origin of this trend in thinking.   even became sinners.” But, how to do   with God ---in which a monistic pantheist   Brakel (1986) doubt this because al-Attas did not
 So, in this respect, the Sufi tradition   this? In QS al-Hadid/57: 3-4, God gave   element was discerned. But the wahdat   look at the rest of the poem,
 must first be sought in the teachings of   a hint, “He is the First and the Last, the   al-shuhud (the unity of vision) begins   “Hath khilafat original science
                                                    From Sayyid Abdul Kadir Jilani”
 Islam itself ---the history of the life of   External and the Internal, and He knows   from recognizing that the highest level   Apparently, al-Attas also did not consider the
 the Prophet and his companions, and   everything. He is with you wherever you   is the disclosure (kasyf) or the vision   verses before and after this. In conclusion,
 11
 especially from the Quran. It is in the   are. Allah is All-Seeing of what you do”.    of God (shuhud), when the self has the   “Fansuri’s origin” is to mean the place of birth,
                                                 while “Sharnawi” is where he found the “science
 interpretation of the Quranic verses that   Furthermore, QS Qaf/50: 15, “…We are   feeling to be part of the Divine. If the   of existence”. Brakel (1979) reinforced this point by
 the main upheaval in the world of Islamic   closer to him than his own arteries.” He   former is monistic in nature, the latter   trying to reconstruct Barus’ historical role, which
                                                 was important in international perspective.
 mystical thought occurred.   is close, but it seems a long road has to   remained within the essential distance   Al-Attas failed to determine Hamzah’s birth year,
 be travelled to meet Him. In the process   between the Creator (al-Khaliq) and   but he was certain that he (Hamzah) did not
 The expression “he, who knows himself,   of becoming connected with God, not   witness Iskandar Muda’s ascend to the throne in
 will know his God” (man ‘arafa nafsahu   those the had created (makhluq).  1607 because, among other reasons, al-Raniri did
 faqad ‘arafa rabbahu) was the beginning   11.  The Indonesian translation is based on Surin,   Based on the texts left to us, we know   not mention him in the Bustanus Salatin. However,
 but the English translation of the verses is based
                                                 said al-Attas (1966: 44-5), it seems that he lived
 of the intensification of worship by way of   on the Sahih International.  that in Southeast Asia the debate on   during the reign of Sultan Alauddin Riayat Shah


 150  Indonesian Islamic Culture in Historical Perspectives     Indonesian Islamic Culture in Historical Perspectives  151
   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165