Page 161 - INDONESIA ISLAMIC CULTURE
P. 161

in the history of Islamic thought,      students, who at least tried to offer an              The main theological concern that      ethics up to the encounter with God the
                                   subsequently followed by Syamsuddin     interpretation of Hamzah’s complicated                caused their dispute was not unique in   Creator. Hamzah read his poems to
                                   al-Sumatrani,  one of Hamzah’s          verses. Al-Raniri, the great scholar from             the history of Islamic mysticism Hamzah,   laymen, in order that:
                                               13
                                                                           Ranir who was also a prolific and sharply             and laters Syamsuddin, were not alone     Keep to both what is incumbent on
                                   (1588-1604). This is partly evidenced by his Ikat-
                                   Ikatan Ilmu’l-Msa that called the king “mukammil”   witted writer, was strongly against both   in this matter. Apart from the great     you and what is usage
                                   (lit. the Perfect King).                                                                      Muslim mystics of Islam’s “golden age”
                                   Only Riayat Shah is known in Acehnese tradition   teachings.                                  like al-Hallaj, Ibn Arabi and others, the   And do not neglect the five statutory
                                   as Sayyid al-Mukammal. However, using textual   the science of Sufism, and he composed several                                          prayers
                                   criticism, Brakel found a taxallo pattern, namely   books.” Iskandar (ed.) 1965. If this was said by   problem of the exact relation between
                                   the freedom of self-expression, and he doubted   a person very well known for being opposed   those created and their Creator was       Distinguish, my dear sir, between
                                   that Fansuri composed this poem (1979: 79-81).   to Syamsuddin’s teachings, then of course    also taken up in Javanese mysticism,
                                   This skepticism was reinforced by Drewes and   we understand, too, that this is indeed a very                                           permitted and forbidden
                                   Brakel (1986: 18-24). Brakel (1969) preferred to   authoritative scholar. He is also mentioned in the   such as in the famous Suluk Wijil and
                                   look at outside sources, namely foreign reports, for   Hikayat Aceh as the foremost scholar in Aceh   Suluk Kalifah. No less important was   For this is a pre-eminently good
                                   instance written by Admiral Beaulieu, who visited   when Sultan Iskandar Muda reached adulthood.   the problem of the mystical origins (usul   work 15
                                   Aceh in 1620 and who mentioned the existence of   Foreign reports, particularly by Dutch and British
                                   scholars, “saints”, who were highly respected.  travelers, state that he was a spiritual adviser   suluk) or the mystical principles that were
                                   It is unknown how many writings Fansuri produced   to Sultan Iskandar Muda. In addition to being a   extensively discussed in “Het Boek van   Or, when he was just reminded again,
                                   but after conducting a variety of internal criticisms   prominent cleric, Syamsuddin also had enough
                                   as well as text comparisons, Drewes and Brakel   authority to enable him to interpret Hamzah   Bonang”; which, according to Drewes’     “Oh all ye who are called Muslims
                                   counted as many as 32 collections of poems. From   Fansuri’s poems (see, Drewes and Brakel and   readings, should more appropriately be
                                   these collections they removed various doubtful   also Hasyimi 194-225, 355-359). He wrote his   called “The Admonitions of Seh Bari”.   Keep to Tradition and the Word
                                   poems which are still included in Doorenbos (1933)   interpretation in his book Kitab Syarah Ruba’i.
                                   and al-Attas (1970). In addition, there are 3 prose   Van Nieuwenhuijze used Syamsuddin’s thoughts   However, Hamzah Fansuri’s role remains   For they contain God’s full message
                                   works, namely (1) Asrar al-Arifin (The Secrets   for his dissertation of 1945. Many of his writings   important in the history of thinking, not   Proclaiming that He is omnipresent 16
                                   of Gnostics), (2) Sharab al-Ashiqin (Lovers’   have been lost, partly because they were burned
                                   Beverage) and (3) al-Muntahi (The End) ---all have   when al-Raniri was influential. One of his works is   only because his works are among the
                                   been published and translated in al-Attas (1970).   the Mir’at al-Mu’min (1601) written in Malay which   oldest, but also because his Sufism   There is no problem. From the point of
                                   Al-Muntahi, which, according to the Sejarah   was also translated into Sundanese. Other writings   reveals itself in a highly aesthetic form.   orthodox sharia, the main elements are
                                   Banten (History of Banten) was sent to Mecca   are the Mir’at al-Muhakkikin and others. For a
                                   along with two other books (± 1630) by the king of   complete list see Saghir Abdullah, 1987. Winstedt   One of the oldest mystical books,   the Unity of God the Omnipresent, the
                                   Banten, is a very difficult book. According Drewes   said, “His mysticism, located between that in India   Serat Suluk Sukarsa, was probably   need to follow the Prophetic tradition and
                                   and Brakel (pp. 12-23), as the name implies, it   and Java, is more speculative than emotional -   directly influenced by Hamzah Fansuri,
                                   was intended for advanced mystics who wanted to   and centers around the unity of existence and the                                  understanding God’s word. But, what
                                   deepen their understanding of “who knows himself,   perfect man” (Winstedt, 1969: 144). Nieuwenhuijze   because the expressions used in it   if this is not only to be understood and
                                   knows his Lord”. On the many difficulties in the al-  estimated that Syamsuddin died in 1630 AD --so   resemble those of Hamzah’s poetry.    followed, but also has to be followed by
                                                                                                                                                                14
                                   Muntahi, see also Brakel (1979: 85-89).  quite a long time before al-Raniri arrived in Aceh   More importantly, as a whole, his poetry   the intensification of nearing oneself with
                                   13.  In his Bustanus-Salatin, al-Raniri wrote,   (1637). And al-Attas is also right that al-Raniri
                                   “Syahdan the time of the death of Sheikh   “was the winner” in the debates against Hamzah     shows a very alluring journey of thought   the Creator? How may we understand
                                   Shamsuddin ibn Abdullah as-Sumatrani, was on   Fansuri and Syamsuddin, because they were only   ---ranging from the necessity of the   Hamzah’s following advice?
                                   the evening of Monday, day twelve of Rajab, the   “represented” by their followers. Moreover, he also   enforcement of the sharia and Islamic
                                   year of Hijrah 1039. The Sheikh was learned in   won because, according to al-Attas, al-Raniri had                                   15.  Drewes & Brakel, 1986: 45.
                                   all sciences, and renowned for his expertise on   distorted their writings (al-Attas, 1966: 16-17).  14.  Poerbatjaraka & Hadidjaja, 1952: 103.  16.  Drewes & Brakel, 1986: 49.



          152  Indonesian Islamic Culture in Historical Perspectives                                                                                                                    Indonesian Islamic Culture in Historical Perspectives  153
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166