Page 15 - tmp_Neat
P. 15

the  Australian  Bureau  of  Statistics.  This  study  also  is  using  multinomial  logit  model  in

               explaining and predicting heavy-vehicle crash severity.


               Study three examines the factors contributing to injury severity in angle crashes involving
               heavy vehicles. The data used in the study include all police-reported collisions in Victoria,

               Australia,  from  2006  to  2016  and  information  on  traffic  volumes  and  road  features  from
               AURIN.  This  study  also  compares  the  binary  logit,  skewed  logistic  (Scobit)  and  random

               parameters logit (with uniform and normal distributions) models.



               1.5      Research Contributions


               This  research provides  evidence-based  recommendations  to  improve the safety of all road

               users in general and heavy vehicle drivers in particular on Australian roads. It is hoped that it
               will save lives and prevent injuries on Australian roads.



               This study contributes to advancing knowledge in the field for the following reasons:


                   To  date  no  research  has  been  conducted  to  understand  the  characteristics  of  single
                    heavy-vehicle collisions at intersections and mid-blocks.



                   To  date  no  study  has  investigated  the  effects  of  neighbourhood  socioeconomic
                    characteristics  of  both  the  crash  location  and  road  users'  residence,  on  traffic  crashes

                    involving heavy vehicles.


                   No previous research has examined the factors contributing to angle crashes in collisions

                    involving heavy vehicles.


                   This  research  compares  several  advanced  methods  to  model  crash  severity,  including
                    binary  logistics,  skewed  logistics  and  mixed  logit  models,  to  provide  road  safety

                    professionals with more information on the relative strengths and weaknesses of these

                    statistical models.










                                                            4
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20