Page 4 - SCS May 2018 - Day 2 Tasks
P. 4

CIMA MAY 2018 – STRATEGIC CASE STUDY

                    5   WRITING STYLE

                    Introduction

                    Writing style is  something that  develops  over  time.  It is  influenced by your  education and
                    experiences. To some it comes easily, they enjoy words – but remember, you are not looking to
                    win any prizes in literature. It’s about putting facts, ideas and opinions in a clear, concise, logical
                    fashion. Some students get very worried about their writing styles. As a general rule you should
                    try to write as you would talk.
                    Logical flow
                    A typical point starts with a statement of fact, either given in the case or derived from analysis –
                    ‘what?’
                    This can then be followed by an interpretation – ‘so what?’ followed by ‘now what?’, or ‘what
                    next?’
                    For example:
                    (1)   What? – The project looks as if it will be profitable.

                    (2)   So what? – Suggesting we should go ahead with the project.
                    (3)   Now what? – Arrange board meeting to discuss strategic implications.
                    A similar structure can be obtained using the Socratic approach – what, why, how?
                    •   So what?
                    •   Why should we use it?
                    •   How does it work?


                    Who is reading the response?
                    Failure  to  pitch the  level correctly will inevitably  result in failure  to  communicate your ideas
                    effectively, since the reader will either be swamped with complexity, or bored with blandness.
                    The recipients of the report should also dictate the level of tact required.


                    Tactless                         Tactful


                    The directors have clearly made  There were  other options open to  the board that, with
                    errors                           hindsight, would have been beneficial

                    The marketing director is responsible  The board should consider where this went wrong? It would
                    for this disastrous change in strategy   appear that the marketing department may have made some
                                                     mistakes













                    18                                                             KAPLAN PUBLISHING
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9