Page 13 - AMANGO MODEL ANSWER 2
P. 13

P a ge  | 13

                                                                     clearly in conflict with objective 1.3



               Recommendation: Liaise with the chamber of mines to collaborate on a common action to either
               lobby government or challenge the charter in a court of law.

               Justification:  Some of the  provisions appear discriminatory, will potentially deprive  some

               shareholders of their property –in violation of the constitution. It manipulates the definition of HDSAs
               and fails to provide the much-needed regulatory certainty to promote investment in the sector.


               Actions:  Group Legal should contact the  Chamber of Mines to seek their representation  for all
               mining  companies. The Board  should investigate  the  ethical concerns  raised separately  and find
               ways to correct any perceptions the government may have about our commitment to transformation.
               B5.     CLIMATE CHANGE AND SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGY


               This issue presents an opportunity to improve our standing for sustainability whilst generation more
               electricity  to power our future  operations.  Our goal is to  reach  the  20%  CO2  emission  reduction
               target in 5 years, while increasing capacity to cope with an expected power demand rise of 10% over

               that period. We evaluate each strategy as below:

               Strategy 1:

               The changes in mix of generation stations have the following effects:
                  Power              Maximum     Operating    Capital cost   No. of   Total capital   Total CO2
                station type         generating   cost of       (US$)       stations   invested   emissions
                                    power (MW)   electricity                           (US $m)     (million
                                                 (US$/MWh)                                         tonnes)
               Coal        Small           300           25         1,320     3            5,280        3.15
                           Large           600           25         2,640     3           10,560       12.61
               Gas         Small           300           50          300      7            2,400        3.15
                           Large           900           50          900      2             1800        7.10
               Nuclear                    1200           20         6,000     3           12,000        0.50
               Total                                                                      32,040       26,51

               The new nuclear station will cost US$6000m. Our total power output is maintained at 10,200 MW
               (300*3 + 600 * 3 + 300 * 7 + 900 * 2 + 1200 * 3) and the total CO2 emissions falls by 15.4% (26.51 to
               22.43 million tonnes).  The operating cost of electricity will fall on average as a nuclear station is the

               cheapest one to operate. Therefore, we have maintained our capacity and reduced CO2 emissions
               but it will not have covered the rise in demand nor met the government’s 20% target for CO2
               reduction.


               Strategy 2:
                                                       Developed by The CharterQuest Institute for 'The CFO Business Case Study Competition 2017'
                                                                          www.charterquest.co.za | Email: thecfo@charterquest.co.za
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18