Page 22 - CIMA SCS Workbook August 2018 - Day 2 Suggested Solutions
P. 22

SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS

                      There is an old saying in performance measurement – “what gets measured gets done”. By not
                      having any KPIs at the moment in two of the four Balanced Scorecard perspectives, there is a
                      danger that  managers in  FNG are not putting  enough energy into  dealing  with  the  other two
                      important areas.

                      Application to FNG – the future
                      Colin Edgar’s email explains that he has been  impressed by the  way Nuncia have used  the
                      Balanced Scorecard to create a  broad  appraisal of the company’s performance. It would  seem
                      sensible for FNG to use a similar approach, to broaden out the number of factors we’re asking our
                      managers to consider, and to make  sure  that  we are focussing on all important aspects of
                      performance, like our competitors seem to be doing.
                      To apply the Balanced Scorecard to FNG, we need to identify some critical success factors (CSFs)
                      under each of the four headings, and then set up suitable KPIs to measure performance in each
                      area. Targets would then need to be set to measure whether each KPI was being achieved or not.
                      I have presented an example below of the CSFs and KPIs that I think would be useful for FNG:


                                                  CSF                          KPI

                      Financial perspective       Profitability                Operating profit margin
                                                  Manage revenue decline       Absolute (rather than %)
                                                                               movements     in   revenue
                                                                               streams
                      Internal business perspective   Retain skilled journalists   Staff turnover ratios

                                                  Purchase     of     recycled % of newsprint sourced  from
                                                  newsprint                    sustainable suppliers

                      Customer perspective        Accuracy of reporting        Number of legal cases brought
                                                                               against FNG

                                                  Accuracy of spelling, grammar  Number of misprints identified
                                                  etc.                         by readers

                      Innovation,  learning  and Digital audience growth       % increase in new users
                      growth perspective
                                                  Growth in contract printing   Number of new contracts won


                      Conclusion
                      By using the Balanced Scorecard, and these KPIs to replace the existing FNG KPIs, I think we can
                      significantly improve the way we evaluate the performance of FNG.
                      The main improvement here is that we are now forcing managers to consider a far wider range of
                      factors.
                      However, the other key issue is that the existing KPIs actually gave a very misleading impression
                      of the performance of FNG. The recent annual report shows that we achieved three of the five
                      targets in the most recent year, but actually performance was not very good. The main problem
                      was that measuring revenue  growth /  decline  in  percentage terms  ignored the  fact that  the



                      KAPLAN PUBLISHING                                                                81
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27