Page 11 - CIMA MCS Workbook February 2019 - Day 2 Suggested Solutions
P. 11

SUGGESTED SOLUTIONS

                  clear that the responsibility for risk lies with all those employed by Crowncare. It will be necessary
                  to consider the most effective means of communication particularly given the number and
                  geographical spread of the dental practices. Crowncare could also instigate internal
                  communication for circulation, e.g. newsletters or blog posts where issues such as recent
                  technological development/changes are highlighted which could potentially have an effect on
                  risk. Similarly recent events where the effect of risk may not have been considered at the earliest
                  opportunity should form part of this communication. Highlighting these events may encourage
                  other departments and the Board to take the new department’s findings seriously.

                  In that context, communication will need to be efficient and effective to assist in this respect. It
                  will need to be a “two‐way” exercise, requiring the ability to deliver clear messages to both
                  internal and external stakeholders with clarity and brevity. Messages should be appropriately
                  structured as this will help the recipients to understand and retain the information.

                  Communication of the new department’s findings is likely to be a regular if not continuous flow of
                  information. It is imperative given the nature of the new department that they should ask for, and
                  listen to feedback. Two way communication of this sort will help prevent misunderstandings and
                  build good working relationships. The new department should explain clearly why any changes it
                  recommends are important to ensure that the importance of their communications is recognised.

                  Risks identified and potential savings made as a result of successfully implemented mitigation
                  practises could be used as performance indicators and would help to demonstrate the
                  department’s importance. The new department should emphasise that non‐acceptance of
                  recommendations made will potentially result in loss of revenue, profitability and perhaps even
                  worse – brand and customer loyalty. Raising the importance in this way would support the
                  introduction of the new department and embed its role for the longer term success of Crowncare.

                  Change management issues associated with the creation of this new department are likely to
                  focus on people issues with new leaders created, skills and capabilities developed and perhaps
                  even jobs changed.

                  Change is unsettling and the leadership of the board is important. In order to motivate the board
                  to make full use of the department’s output it is important that the CEO demonstrates this
                  support.

                  It is recommended that a business case for any new department be made, with specific examples
                  of risks that have occurred in the industry identified to support this aim.

                  Financial Manager








                  KAPLAN PUBLISHING                                                                   101
   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16