Page 15 - CIMA SCS Workbook November 2018 - Day 2 Tasks
P. 15

RISK MANAGEMENT (P3)     - PRACTICE TASKS


                  EXERCISE 2


                  UPDATE
                  It’s mid-afternoon on a Wednesday and you’ve just settled back down to your desk after making
                  yourself a mug of tea and chatting to Fiona Dubin about who is going to win this year’s Strictly. As
                  you unlock your computer the following email appears in your inbox:



                  TRIGGER



                  Email

                  To:        Senior Manager
                  From:      Dirk Lepain
                  Subject:    Succession planning and board structure

                  I have today received a letter from one of our largest shareholders – copy attached.

                  You will see that they are particularly unhappy with the share price performance and the lack of
                  new product development we have had in recent times. They have laid the blame squarely at one
                  of our long serving and loyal directors.

                  I am not surprised that questions are being asked; indeed, our share price performance has not
                  been good over the last three years and the shareholders were bound to start pointing fingers at
                  someone at some point.

                  We need to draft a response explaining the processes we have in place for reviewing performance
                  and succession planning. As you know we have committees in place for this kind of thing, it is part
                  of the Cronland Code of Corporate Governance (which was adopted from The UK Corporate
                  Governance Code). I haven’t got the time do the full response and I know you’re well-versed on
                  the contents of the Code. Please could you put together a briefing paper that addresses the
                  processes we have in place, committees, what they all do, etc. so we can include it as part of our
                  response.

                  Secondly, it did get me thinking about how it could be time for us to make some changes to our
                  Board structure. I know Anton has expressed his frustration at the way technology has changed
                  the way we do medicine and his dislike for computers. Please could you outline a plan for how we
                  could improve our Board structure over the next few years to help adjust for the changing needs
                  of the pharmaceuticals world and how Novak has grown? This part of the briefing paper is just for
                  me to consider at the moment, I won’t be sharing this at the next Board meeting.

                  You’ll appreciate that this is all to be treated in the strictest confidence.









                  KAPLAN PUBLISHING                                                                    31
   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20