Page 396 - SSB Interview: The Complete Guide, Second Edition
P. 396

Cash crunch for the project
               Axis Bank Ltd. was appointed “loan arranger” for the project in 2005. Since

               its inception in 2004, costs have skyrocketed to at least `4,000 crore, interest
               rates have crawled higher and old loan terms have lapsed. Even before the
               first dredger began its work in 2005, costs had already spiralled to more than

               `3,500 crore. The loan sanctions, valid only up to `2,400 crore, lapsed. To
               secure more money, Sethusamudram Corp. Ltd would have to return to the
               drawing board, draw up new reports, sit with parliamentary committees and

               receive  fresh  approval.  The  project  cost  which  originally  stood  at  `24,700
               crore will now escalate by almost `4,500 crore, a shipping ministry source

               said.

               Environmental

               According to the Environmental Impact Assessment carried out by the Indian
               government on 2 July 2005, the project would disturb the ecological balance
               and would be the reason for the death of corals. It is also an important fishing

               ground  for  the  state  of  Tamil  Nadu.  There  exists  a  biological  park  in  the
               vicinity  of  the  proposed  project.  Local  fishermen,  Hindus,  Muslims  and
               Christians  alike  oppose  the  present  route  and  are  demanding  alternative

               channels, which are available. They say the present channel would destroy
               marine life and corals. This will kill the trade in shankhas (conch shells) that
               has a turnover in excess of `150 crore (`1.5 billion) per annum. Invaluable

               thorium deposits would be affected, which are too important for our nuclear
               fuel requirements.

                 Professor  Tad  Murthy,  the  world-renowned  tsunami  expert,  who  advised

               the  Government  of  India  on  the  tsunami  warning  system  and  edited  the
               Tsunami  Journal  for  over  20  years,  has  also  warned  that  the  present
               Sethusamudram  route  may  result  in  tsunami  waves  hitting  Kerala  more

               fiercely. In reply to a query regarding the Sethusamudram’s impact, he wrote,
               “During the Indian Ocean tsunami of 26 December 2004, the southern part of
               Kerala  was  generally  spared  from  a  major  tsunami,  mainly  because  the

               tsunami waves from Sumatra region travelling south of the Sri Lankan island,
               partially  diffracted  northward  and  affected  the  central  part  of  the  Kerala

               coast. Since the tsunami is a long gravity wave (similar to tides and storm
   391   392   393   394   395   396   397   398   399   400   401