Page 427 - Services Selection Board (SSB) Interviews

Speed Test ST - 17
Speed Test-6 10. (d) 11. (c) 12. (a) 13. (b)

1. (c) 2. (c) 3. (d) 4. (b) 14. (d)
5. (d) 15. (d) Rest are containers.
6. (d) From I : S is one of the brothers of P. Speed Test-7
But P's gender is unknown. 1. (d) Argument : I does not tell about the bad aspect
From II : K is the sister of M and the aunt of S. of corporal punishment and why banning is

From III : L is the only sister of P. necessary. Hence I is not strong.
P's gender is unknown. Argument: II is also not strong because the
From I and II : P is either the niece or nephew of argument is obsessed with an inappropriate
K. assumption that scare of corporal punishment
Since p's gender is not known, therefore, we leads a child to studies.
can't find the exact relationship. 2. (d) Both I and II are strong. I is strong because it
Thus, both I and II together are not sufficient. is not necessary that all the rickshawpullers
and prisoners have unsuitable bloods. Hence, I
From II and III : we can not find the relationship stresses on the importance of blood donation.
between K and P. Whereas II is strong because banning those
Thus II and III together are not sufficient. persons from donation of blood is a good
From I and III : Nothing is known about K Thus, precautionary step.
we can't find any relationship between P and K. 3. (d) I is strong because today privatisation is known
Thus I and III together are not sufficient. as a panacea. II is also strong because if there is
From I, II and III : Since P's gender is not know, a lack of dedication on the part of policy-makers
as well as people’s participation, how can the
it is not possible to find the exact relationship city’s crumbling civic services be cured merely
between P and K. by transferring it to private hands ?
Thus, all I, II and III even together are not 4. (b) The advantage shown in argument I is unlikely
sufficient. to be true and is far-fetched. But II is strong
7. (a) From I : A > C > D because we should not ignore our tradition.
From II : E > B > 5. (b) I is an absurd argument. Hence it is weak. II is a
From I and II : E > B > A > C > D strong argument because it goes into the reason
Thus, D is the lightest. behind the pension schemes. And how the move
Thus, only I and II together are sufficient. will badly affect the employee’s life.
From II and III : Nothing is said about C and 6. (a) From A : B = 2S;
From B : B – 1 = 3/2 S;
D thus, we can't say exactly who is the lightest. From C : (S – I)4 = B
From I and III : A > C > D Where B = no. of brothers; S = no. of sisters we
Nothing is said about B and E. have three different equations. Hence any two
Thus, we can't say exactly who is the lightest of them will be sufficient. Obviously, any one of
Thus, both I and III together are not sufficient them is redundant.
8. (a) 9. (b) 7. (d) we cannot say, as we don’t know the time of the
Solution for 10–14 : day.
8. (d) 9. (d) 10. (a) 11. (d)
Person Bank City 12. (c)
A Canara Kanpur 13. (b) Conversion of (a) + (b) = Conclusions
B Vijaya Jaipur III [Because, I + A = I]. Statements (b) +
C Dena Delhi conversion of (c) = Conclusions II [Because, A
D Syndicate Pilibhit + E = E]. Some scooters are cars (Conclusions
E Central Lucknow III) + conversion of (c) = Some scooters are not
jeeps [Because, I + E = O]. Hence I does not
F UCO Agra follow.