Page 25 - DIVA_1_2007_No.28
P. 25

CERN'S 1984 Nobel prizewinners Carlo Rubbia (left) and Simon van der Meer © CERN

              special responsibility for   based power plant just  With the Carlo Rubbia  What more can we
              the development of such   as efficient as traditional  concept, it's impossible to  hope? That Professor
              a nuclear reactor. This   nuclear power stations?   have the kind of accident  Lillestøl will succeed in
              would, in my mind, be an                       that happened in Chernobyl,  this endeavour and that
              important Norwegian    If you bum one kilogram  simply because the reactor  Norway and other coun-
              contribution to preserve   (kg) of thorium, in compa-  will not melt down like it did  tries will support his
              the standard of living for   rison with today's use of  then. You cannot give that  battle for this new ener-
              future generations.    uranium, you will get 250  same guarantee in terms of  gy which sounds very
                                     times more energy out of  safety for the new nuclear  appealing...
              It is a huge project   it than you would out of  power plants (often called
              costing some 550 million   the uranium. So, first of  the fourth generation);  For further information,
              Euros, but I am not sug-  all, thorium is far more  although I think they will be  please visit Professor
                                                                                                     webs ite
              gesting that Norway    efficient energy-wise and,  safer than those constructed  Lillestøl's
              should finance it alone. It   secondly, there exists  earlier.          http:llweb.ift. uib.no/—Iill
              should at least guarantee   three to four times more                    estol/Energy_Web/Ener
              it so that the first proto-  thorium in the world than  In addition, by using the  gy_and%20Thorium.ht
              type could be built and   there is uranium -- you  Carlo Rubbia concept the  ml
              that we could gather   find it in the United States,  problem of nuclear waste
              expertise somewhere in   Australia, India and  will be reduced substantial-
              order to work on this pro-  Norway. However, if you  ly. Not only will you get less
              ject for the benefit of the   look for it, important  waste, but you will also not
              whole world, and not    reserves of thorium will  obtain the large quantities of
              only for one single coun-  be found in many other  plutonium that nations can
              try. It would not only   countries.            use for making bombs.
              boost education and                            Looking at Iran and North
              expertise in this field in   Q: Talking about  Korea, one can wonder whe-
              Norway, but also else-  nuclear energy, the  ther it is the energy aspect
                                                   accident  that they were most interes-
              where.                  Chernobyl
                                      comes to people's minds.  ted in or the bombs
              Q: Is this thorium-

                                                                                                   1 2007 Diva 23

                                              i vain         ernattonal.ch
   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30