Page 164 - BLENDED LEARNING
P. 164

of telecoms engineers, but it was what they voted for! However, it was through
               constant evaluation of these moves, and discussions with all stakeholders, trainers,
               managers, participants, and the client that we were able to innovate in a way that was
               ‘safe’, managed and palatable.
               In summary, our context was key, and the stakeholders led the thinking. The technology
               came only in response to client needs, exploring features in our context, while at the
               same time working within trainers’ sense of plausibility. Prabhu (1990) says that the
               best method is one that meets a teacher’s ‘sense of plausibility’. The teachers who
               worked on this project were the ones who were most able to grasp this use of IT,
               and could see how this could support language learning. We set off with a general
               language-learning pedagogy in mind, and learned as we went.

               Practical considerations and recommendations

               ■ ■ Operate within teachers’ sense of plausibility.
               ■ ■ Seek support from colleagues, managers, and other available networks.
               ■ ■ Be open to questions about the proposed course’s learning outcomes.
               ■ ■ Be open about the business model.
               ■ ■ Seek to learn from trying to formulate answers to challenges.
               ■ ■ Place learning and context first, technology second.
               ■ ■ Create opportunities for learning.
               ■ ■ Carry out an IT audit to see if your proposed tools will run on your and your
                 client’s system.
               ■ ■ Use tools in a way that create affordances for dialogue rather than just mono-
                 directional instruction.
               ■ ■ Put tools in student hands as often as possible.
               ■ ■ Consider how the course will evolve and change as well as how improvements will
                 be decided on.

               We responded in a transparent way to feedback at the end of each course and to
               input on needs at the beginning of each course. At the same time we had to deal with
               disappointment when certain interventions were not to the standard we hoped for, or
               did not reap the desired responses from participants. Each course built on the last,
               each time hoping to garner more positive feedback and better learning. This project
               shows how a course can develop with a partner over a longer period.

               Final word
               More than any course I have worked on, or designed, these CBECs afforded high
               levels of challenge and variety to me as an experienced and growing, DELTA qualified
               teacher, and later business manager. These challenges, which came about as a result
               of contextual realities, led to my pursuit of deeper questions about teaching and
               learning online that I pursued in an educational technology-focused MA. By adopting
               a learning mindset, and by working closely with our partner, this experience became



 160   |  A longitudinal case study of the ‘blends’     A longitudinal case study of the ‘blends’  |   161
   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169