Page 232 - BLENDED LEARNING
P. 232

What are the limiting factors?
               Although not directly referred to in the case studies there are indications that
               this question was considered, especially when it came to choosing software. For
               example, Eydelman (Chapter 3) was constrained by costs; as there was no budget
               for software the choice was limited to what was free. In my context sustainability
               was a key consideration so the design had to reflect this and the courses had to be
               cost-effective to run and maintain once the financial support from stakeholders had
               been removed. This had an impact on the materials we chose and the number of
               computers that we purchased. There was also no internet connection in our language
               centres, which significantly limited the software that was available to us.

               2. Course design
               The second stage in the design process can commence once you have familiarised
               yourself with your context, determined what your reasons for blending are and
               identified the limiting factors. Armed with this information and having determined that
               a blended approach is appropriate for your context the design stage can begin and
               the next set of questions can be addressed.
               What are you going to blend?
               The definitions of blended learning in ELT given in the introductory chapter all
               refer to a combination of two modes, face-to-face and technology – computer
               assisted language learning (CALL), or online. These two modes were incorporated
               in all the blends described, with the authors choosing a variety of software for the
               online component, with Moodle being the most popular choice (see Table 4). The
               decision on what software to use was often influenced by the level of institutional
               infrastructure and support, so for example Gilbert (Chapter 1) chose Moodle because
               it was the University’s official Course Management System and Pardo-Gonzalez
               (Chapter 4) chose Wimba because ‘it suited our needs and allowed us to further
               develop the English program without becoming programmers or engineers.’

               Table 4: Software choices for the technology mode
                Software                   Author and Chapter
                Moodle                     Gilbert (Chapter 1); Aborisade (Chapter 2); Peachey
                                           (Chapter 5); Dudeney and Hockly (Chapter 6); Bo and
                                           O’Hare (Chapter 7); Hirst and Godfrey (Chapter 9)
                PBWorks                    Eydelman (Chapter 3); Ingham (Chapter 15)
                Wimba                      Pardo-Gonzalez (Chapter 4)
                A VLE e.g. Moodle or Blackboard  White et al. (Chapter 8)
                Pearson Fronter            Douglas and Paton (Chapter 10)
                Mobile phones              Kern (Chapter 11)
                Posterous                  Kern (Chapter 11)
                Flash                      Beagle and Davies (Chapter 12)
                Email                      Keedwell (Chapter 13); Russell (Chapter 14)
                Screencasts                Russell (Chapter 14)
                Reward CD-ROMs             Whittaker (Chapter 16)




 228   |  Conclusion                                              Conclusion  |   229
   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237