Page 34 - Sharp-Hundley 2012
P. 34

However, in Chapter 13, debts arising under § 523(a)(15) are dischargeable if the debtor receives a
        full-compliance  discharge.    In  re  McCreary,  2009  WL  5215587  (Bankr.  C.D.  Ill.  2009).    Thus,  if  the
        obligation is not a support obligation but arises from a divorce or separation agreement or order,
        the debtor is only required to pay a required pro rata share of the funds available in the Chapter 13
        plan.  The creditor spouse is treated as a general unsecured creditor and, upon successful completion of
        the plan, any remaining balance is discharged.  In re Rabideau, 2011 WL 165179 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 2011).

             Thus,  the  distinction  between  support  and  other  obligations  is  significant  in  Chapter  13  cases.
        “Whether a debt is nondischargeable as being in the nature of alimony, maintenance or support . . . is a
                              matter of federal, not state, law.”  In re Marriage of Lytle, 105 Ill.App.3d 1095 (1982).
                              11 U.S.C. § 101(14A) defines a domestic support obligation as a debt (1) owed to or
                              recoverable by a spouse, former spouse or child; (2) that is in the nature of alimony,
                              maintenance, or support; (3) that is established by a court order; and (4) that has not
                              been assigned to a governmental entity.  State law is used to ascertain the incidents
                              or  nature  of  the  debt  to  determine  whether  it  fits  within  the  federal  exception.
        Marriage of Lytle.  The label attached and the language of the decree or underlying agreement are not
        controlling  in  determining dischargeability; rather,  one must look to the substance of the decree or
        agreement to determine the essential nature of the obligation.  Marriage of Lytle.

             Thus, courts have held that attorney’s fees owed to a former spouse, or the former spouse’s attorney,
        in conjunction with or awarded in the context of a support obligation have met the definition of “domestic
        support obligation”.  See Johnson, discussed above; In re Papi, 427 B.R. 457 (Bankr. N.D.
        Ill. 2010).

             Whereas  in  Chapter  13  debts  under  §  523(a)(15)  are  potentially  dischargeable,  in
        Chapter  7  debts  arising  in  the  course  of  a  divorce  or  separation  are  unqualifiedly  non-
        dischargeable.  In re Harn, 2008 WL 130914 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 2008).  (However, note that §
        523(a)(15)  was  markedly  changed  by  BAPCPA;  previously,  courts  applied  a  balancing
        approach to determine whether the debtor could reasonably afford to pay such debts and
        the  resulting  harm  posed  to  the  creditor  spouse  in  the  event  of  a  discharge,  and  this
        approach no longer applies.)

             Serious Consideration Required:  An individual and his or her attorney involved in settlement
        of a dissolution action should clearly set forth the intent of the parties and insure that it meets the federal
        definition  for  the  type  of  obligation  the  agreement  is  attempting  to  achieve.    Furthermore,  the  parties
                               should be made aware  that particular obligations set forth in the agreement may
                               ultimately  be  non-dischargeable  in  a  bankruptcy  proceeding.    Hold-harmless
                               agreements  have  been  held  nondischargeable  in  Chapter  7  proceedings  per  §
                               523(a)(15), as have agreements to pay mortgage obligations.  See In re Walden,
                               312 B.R. 187 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. 2004).

                                   For  debtors  with  significant  marital  debt,  consideration  must  be  given  to  the
                               benefit afforded in a Chapter 13 case, when selecting under which chapter to file.
                               In McCreary, discussed above, the bankruptcy court held that a former husband’s
        filing  of  a  Chapter  13  bankruptcy  instead  of  a  Chapter  7  to  avoid,  among  other  things,  paying  the  full
        amount due his former wife under a property settlement was legitimate and not in bad faith.

                                                                                                      John\Sharp Thinking\#72.doc
        ●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●
                                           THE  SHARP  LAW  FIRM,  P.C.

                1115 Harrison, P.O. Box 906, Mt. Vernon, IL 62864 • Telephone 618-242-0246 • Facsimile 618-242-1170 • www.thesharpfirm.com

           Business Transactions • Litigation • Financial Law • Problem Finances • Real Estate • Corporate • Commercial Disputes • Creditors’ Rights •
                           Arbitration • Administrative Law • Employment Matters • Estate Planning • Probate • Family Law

          Terry Sharp: Tsharp@lotsharp.com; John T. Hundley: Jhundley@lotsharp.com; Rebecca L. Reinhardt: Rreinhard@lotsharp.com;
                                             Bentley J. Bender: Bbender@lotsharp.com

                                                        Advertising Material
   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39