Page 521 - Atlas of Creation Volume 3
P. 521

Harun Yahya






                 Despite all arguments made in the past in favor of considering heterochromatin as junk, many people active
                 in the field no longer doubt that it plays functional roles. . . . Nucleotides may individually be junk, and
                 collectively, gold.  86

                 One of these "collective" functions of heterochromatin can be seen in meiotic pairing. At the same
             time, studies of artificial chromosomes show that these segments of DNA have various functions.                    87


                 3. Researchers have shown a relationship between non-coding DNA and the cell nucleus—a

                 development that spells the end of the "junk DNA" concept.

                 A 1999 study examining the genomes of the single-celled photosynthetic organisms known as
             Crytomonads discovered that eukaryotic non-coding DNA (also called secondary DNA) was functional

             in the nucleus.
                 Characteristically, these organisms show a wide variation in size. But even if they are of varying di-
             mensions, there always remains a direct proportion between the size of their nucleus and that of the
             overall cell.

                 Seeing the proportion be-
             tween the amount of non-
             coding DNA and the size of
             the nucleus, researchers con-

             cluded that more non-cod-
             ing DNA was a structural
             necessity required in larger
             nuclei. This new research

             was a major blow to such
             concepts as junk DNA and
             Dawkins' "selfish" DNA
             that dismiss the fact of

             Creation.  88  The researchers
             concluded their report by
             saying:

                 Furthermore, the present
                 lack of significant amounts of

                 nucleomorph secondary DNA
                 . . . refut[es] "selfish" and "junk"
                 theories of secondary DNA.     89



                 4. Non-coding DNA was dis-
                 covered to be necessary for the
                 chromosome structure.


                 In the past few years, another important
             role played by non-coding DNA has been dis-
             covered: It is absolutely necessary for the struc-
             ture and functioning of chromosomes. Studies

             have shown that non-coding DNA provides the struc-
             ture that lets DNA perform various functions—which it
             cannot in the absence of a formed structure. Scientists ob-
             served that elimination of a telomere (the DNA-protein

             complexes at both ends of chromosomes that grow smaller






                                                                                                                          Adnan Oktar    519
   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526