Page 55 - ATENEO SERVED 2020 E-BOOK_Neat
P. 55

Ateneo Science Educators and Researchers in Virtual
         Engagement (SERVE) 2020 Ateneo de Manila University
         School of Science and Engineering
         MS Science Education  Program of Biology Department









              Four-Tier Multiple Choice Test Questions: A Proposed Formative Assessment Tool in Chemistry

                                                                          b
                                       a*
                      Glenda P. Dy, MSc  , Armando Victor M. Guidote Jr., PhD , and Cornelia C. Soto, PhD c

                     a                                  b
                      Jose Abad Santos High School, DepEd Manila  Department of Chemistry, School of Science and Engineering,
                                                    c
                               Ateneo de Manila  University,  Ateneo de Manila University- School of Social Sciences
                                           * Corresponding Author: glendady@yahoo.com


                                                        ABSTRACT


                Science  teaching  should  facilitate  learning,  improve  conceptual  understanding,  and  develop  the
            students’  capacity  to  reason  scientifically.  Determining  the  strength  and  weaknesses  of  the  learners  is
            important  to  improve  the  teaching-learning  process.  Formative  assessment  is  an  important  tool  in
            determining the strength and weaknesses of students. It may provide information about how well students
            learned.
            This  study  aims  to  propose  an  alternative  to  traditional  multiple-choice  tests  that  may  assess  students’
            conceptual  knowledge  and  reasoning  by  using  a  Four-tier  multiple  choice  test  (FTMCT)  as  a  formative
            assessment tool. The four-tier multiple choice questionnaire is composed of the following: the first-tier, a
            knowledge question, the second-tier, the student's level of confidence to the answer on the knowledge test
            question, the third-tier, inquired for the reasoning used to answer the first-tier response, and the fourth tier
            asked for the level of confidence to the answer on the third-tier by the participants. It is expected to uncover
            the students' understanding of the core concepts and their reasoning about the concept used to arrive at
            the first-tier response.
            The FTMCT was prepared by the researcher. To ensure the validity of the test, the FTMCT was validated by
            five  science  and  chemistry  teachers.  The  test  was  conducted  among  the  grade  12  students  who  took
            Chemistry  1  in  the  previous  year  and  the  grade  11  students  who  are  currently  taking  Chemistry.  Item
            analysis was made to aid the researcher modify the test to suit its purpose. The item difficulty and item
            discrimination were determined.
            The result shows that students find it easier to answer the knowledge question with confidence but with
            difficulty answering the reasoning question with confidence. The paper concludes that FTMCT is a necessary
            tool  as  a  formative  assessment  in  determining  the  conceptual  knowledge  and  reasoning  ability  of  the
            students which may equate to deep understanding.


            Keywords: Four-tier multiple choice test, Formative assessment, Knowledge, Reasoning
















                                                            55
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60