Page 102 - Suri’s - NCDRC ON LIFE INSURANCE 2017 V1.3
P. 102

Suri’s - NCDRC ON LIFE INSURANCE 2017                    102



                          2.  BIRLA  SUN  LIFE  INSURANCE  COM-
                       PANY LTD.
                          THROUGH ITA BRANCH MANAGER, SCO
                       149-151,  RED  SQUARE  MARKET,  NEAR
                       MENRWA HOTEL
                          HISAR
                          HARYANA
                          3.  BIRLA  SUN  LIFE  INSURANCE  COM-
                       PANY LTD.
                          THROUGH ITS SIGNATORY AUTHORITY,
                       OFFICE ANDHERI KURLA ROAD, NEAR MA-
                       ROL NAKKA, ANDHERI (E)
                          MUMBAI
                          MAHARASHTRA


                         BE-
                       FORE:
                                   HON'BLE  MR.  JUSTICE  AJIT  BHARIHOKE,PRESIDING
                                MEMBER
                                   HON'BLE MR. ANUP K THAKUR,MEMBER

                         For   the   Peti-  MR. BHARAT SWAROOP SHARMA
                       tioner :
                         For the Respondent :

                       Dated : 18 May 2017
                         ORDER
                                This revision is directed against the order of the  State Commission Haryana,
                       Panchkula dated 11.11.2016 in first appeal No.FA/170/2015 whereby the State Com-
                       mission allowed the appeal preferred by the respondent/opposite party, set aside the
                       order of the District Forum and dismissed the complaint.
                          2.   Briefly stated facts relevant for the disposal of the revision petition are that the
                       father of the petitioner/complainant had purchased an insurance policy for Rs.10 lakhs
                       from  the  opposite party.  The  policy  was  valid  w.e.f.  30.9.2012.  Father of  the  peti-
                       tioner during the subsistence of the insurance policy died on 17.7.2013. The petitioner
                       being the legal heir filed the insurance claim. The opposite party repudiated the claim
                       on the plea that the insured had obtained the insurance policy by concealing the mate-
                       rial fact that he was suffering from Diabetes Mellitus and Palloor. Being aggrieved of
                       the repudiation of the insurance claim the petitioner filed consumer complaint in Dis-
                       trict Forum, Fatehabad.
                          3.   The opposite party on being served resisted the consumer complaint and justi-
                       fied the repudiation for the reason noted above.




                                                       INDEX
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107