Page 105 - Suri’s - NCDRC ON LIFE INSURANCE 2017 V1.3

Suri’s - NCDRC ON LIFE INSURANCE 2017 105

Investigator report - Conclusion of the investigator is based upon something
revealed during investigation - However, there is no evidence to show as to what is
the source of that revelation - Therefore, it cannot be said that the petitioner has
discharged its onus to prove that the insured had committed suicide - Thus, in our
view, even the repudiation is not justified.

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI

REVISION PETITION NO. 1962 OF 2017

(Against the Order dated 19/05/2017 in Appeal No. 637/2016 of the State Com-
mission West Bengal)
1. BRANCH MANAGER, HDFC STANDARD
LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD.
GR. FLOOR, MENAKA ESTATE 3, RED
CROSS PLACE,
KOLKATA-700001
WEST BENGAL ...........Petitioner(s)

Versus
1. PRADOSH MANDAL & ANR.
S/O. SUDHIR CHANDRA MANDAL, VIL-
LAGE AND POST KHANDAPASARA, POLICE
STATION CHANDIPUR, PURBA
MEDINIPUR,
WEST BENGAL
2. MRS. DIPSIKHA MONDAL,
BESIDE SWAPAN DASGUPTA, LIVER EM-
PLOYOS HSG, VILLAGE AND POST, PURBA
SRIKRISHNAPUR, P.S. SUTAHATA, PURBA
MEDINIPUR
WEST BEGNAL ...........Respondent(s)

BE-
FORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT BHARIHOKE,PRESIDING
MEMBER
HON'BLE MRS. REKHA GUPTA,MEMBER

For the Peti- MR. ABHIK KR. DAS

INDEX