Page 141 - Suri’s - NCDRC ON LIFE INSURANCE 2017 V1.3
P. 141

Suri’s - NCDRC ON LIFE INSURANCE 2017                    141



                              tioning this period of one year, has not been indicated - A perusal
                              of  the  proposal  form  indicates  that  the  insured  disclosed  in  the

                              same that he used to take 100 ml of alcohol per week for the last
                              15  years  -  It  has  not  been  clarified  anywhere  if  such  an  intake

                              shall qualify him to be called a ‗chronic alcoholic‘-  In any case,

                              the deceased disclosed the fact about his intake of alcohol in the
                              proposal form and hence, it was upon the Insurance Company to

                              decide whether to issue the policy to him or not  -  The insured

                              could not be accused of providing any misinformation. ...90
                       Material concealment – In the Proposal form the deceased insured inter-

                              alia maintained that he had not been admitted to any hospital or
                              Nursing home for general observation, treatment or operation  -

                              He had also denied having taken alcoholic drinks -   Statement of
                              wife of the deceased insured wherein she inter-alia stated that her

                              husband was a habitual drinker even before her marriage - State-

                              ment recorded on 19.9.2005 would show that the marriage hap-
                              pened about five years ago, meaning thereby it happened some-

                              time  in  the  year  2010  -   Therefore,  the  deceased  insured  obvi-
                              ously made a false statement in the proposal form when he denied

                              consuming liquor.  Held, 7.      On merits, the learned counsel for
                              the  petitioner  Corporation   has  drawn  my  attention  to  the  pro-

                              posal form dated 16.12.2004, wherein the deceased insured inter-

                              alia maintained that he had not been admitted to any hospital or
                              Nursing  home  for  general  observation,  treatment  or  operation.

                              He had also denied having taken alcoholic drinks.  He has drawn

                              my attention to the statement of Smt. A.R. Sudha, wife of the de-




                                                       INDEX
   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146