Page 142 - Suri’s - NCDRC ON LIFE INSURANCE 2017 V1.3
P. 142

Suri’s - NCDRC ON LIFE INSURANCE 2017                    142



                              ceased insured wherein she inter-alia stated that her husband was
                              a  habitual  drinker  even  before  her  marriage.   The  statement  re-

                              corded  on  19.9.2005  would  show  that  the  marriage  happened
                              about five years ago, meaning thereby it happened sometime in

                              the year 2010.  Therefore, the deceased insured obviously made a

                              false statement in the proposal form when he denied consuming
                              liquor. 9.      The learned counsel for the petitioner has also drawn

                              my attention to additional affidavit filed by the petitioner Corpo-

                              ration.  In the said affidavit, it is stated that as per the new busi-
                              ness underwriting guidelines which were being followed during

                              the relevant period, in the case of an occasional consumer con-
                              suming alcohol, the would have obtained physicians report, be-

                              sides  investigations  such  as  SGOT,  SGPT  and  GGTP.   All  the
                              aforesaid investigations pertain to the state of health of the liver.

                              Had the petitioner disclosed in the proposal form that he had been

                              taking liquor he would have been subjected to physical examina-
                              tion by a physician and would also have been investigated for as-

                              certaining the state of his liver by undergoing investigations such
                              as SGOT, SGTP and GGTP.   It is therefore evident that the de-

                              ceased had made a material concealment from the petitioner Cor-
                              poration with respect to the state of his health which influenced

                              advantage of the insurer on the question as to whether the pro-

                              posal  for  insurance  should  be  accepted  or  not.   On  this  ground
                              also, the repudiation of the claim was fully justified. ...17

                       Material concealment – In the Proposal form the deceased insured inter-

                              alia maintained that he had not been admitted to any hospital or




                                                       INDEX
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147