Page 145 - Suri’s - NCDRC ON LIFE INSURANCE 2017 V1.3
P. 145

Suri’s - NCDRC ON LIFE INSURANCE 2017                    145



                              from  the  Haryana  Roadways  in  the  year  2008,  because  of  his
                              weak eyesight and that he was not drawing any pension -   Com-

                              plainant had nowhere contradicted the version given by the OP
                              Insurance Company that the life assured was not a pensioner -  It

                              is  evident,  therefore,  that  it  was  the  duty  of  the  life  assured  to

                              provide  truthful  and  correct  information  to  the  Insurance  Com-
                              pany at the time of filling up the proposal form -  The contention

                              taken  by  the  complainant  that  the  form  was  filled  by  an  agent,

                              does not provide him any benefit, because it has not been denied
                              that  the  said  form  was  submitted  by  the  life  assured  under  his

                              own signatures. ...120
                       Material fact concealment  -  Not proved  - Proposal form filled by the

                                                th
                              complainant on 28  March, 2012 wherein the complainant in re-
                              sponse to the questionnaire pertaining to his health, particularly

                              regarding heath ailment and diabetes mellitus has answered in the

                              negative  -  Hospital  record  of  11.4.2013  wherein  the  concerned
                              doctor  has  recorded  that  the  complainant  visited  his  clinic  with

                              history of pain in chest and uneasiness and that the patient was
                              advised ECG which showed some changes - There is also a men-

                              tion about diabetes mellitus-2 -  This document, is of no avail to
                              the insurance company because the document is of the date after

                              the submission of the proposal form -  Counsel for the petitioner

                              has failed to show any evidence which could lead us to the con-
                              clusion that prior to 28.3.2012 the complainant was found suffer-

                              ing from any heart ailment or diabetes mellitus.  ...25

                       Medical  Certificates  issued  by  Doctors  -  Dr.  Rajendra  Kumar  is




                                                       INDEX
   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150