Page 241 - Civil Engineering Project Management, Fourth Edition
P. 241

221
                                                                       Variations and claims
                          concerning a contractor’s claim, nor does he have to make a decision on a
                          claim, which does not give ‘full and detailed particulars of the amount claimed’
                          (Clause 53(4) and (6)). However, once the engineer finds some payment due in
                          respect of a claim he must certify this payment in the next interim payment to
                          the contractor.
                            If the engineer decides that some payment is due to a contractor but unrea-
                          sonably fails to certify it in the next certificate; or if the employer fails to pay part
                          or all of an amount certified for payment by the engineer, the employer has to
                          pay to the contractor ‘interest compounded monthly for each day on which
                          the payment is overdue or which should have been certified’ (Clause 60(7)). The
                          same clause provides that should a matter in dispute go to arbitration, and ‘the
                          arbitrator holds that any sum or additional sum should have been certified by
                          a particular date’ then interest will be payable on it, starting from 28 days after
                          the engineer should have certified the sum. The rate stipulated is 2 per cent
                          above the base lending rate of the bank specified in the Appendix to tender.
                            It should be noted that this interest is only applicable following a failure by
                          the employer or the engineer. There is no general provision that interest is due
                          for any gap in time between the costs being incurred and an amount being
                          included in a certificate; much less so if any delay is due to a contractor failing
                          to supply details of his claim.



                          17.14 Adjudication


                          The Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act, 1996, (see Section 1.6)
                          introduced for the first time in English Law a requirement that all construction
                          contracts must include certain terms. These include payment provisions as set
                          out in Section 1.6 and also provisions to allow either party to take any dispute to
                          adjudication at any time. Most standard conditions were immediately amended
                          to comply with the law, but for those, which were not so amended, the provi-
                          sions of The Scheme for Construction Contracts Regulations 1998 will apply. The
                          provisions of the Act apply to all construction works and work associated with
                          construction in the UK such as architecture, design and surveying. There are
                          some limited exceptions such as drilling for oil or gas, supply of materials and
                          erection of machinery as set out in the  Act but in effect most construction
                          contracts and related consultancy agreements will be included.
                            The provisions of the Act require that should a dispute arise under the con-
                          tract then this dispute can be referred to adjudication at any time and appoint-
                          ment of an adjudicator must follow within 7 days. The adjudicator must act
                          impartially and is given wide powers to ascertain the facts and the law. He must
                          reach his decision within 28 days or a longer period if agreed by both parties.
                          This period is seen by some as too short for major and complex disputes but
                          appears to have worked well in practice for straightforward matters including
                          technical issues, simple claims and claims for non payment. While most stand-
                          ard forms of contract always had similar provisions, the introduction of
   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246