Page 238 - Civil Engineering Project Management, Fourth Edition
P. 238

Civil Engineering Project Management
                          218
                          adopting different methods for construction than he planned in his programme
                          and might involve him in more cost. On the other hand, if there are several
                          buildings, which the contractor has programmed to construct in sequence, and
                          one of them is delayed by foundation problems, the contractor can divert his
                          workforce to those not delayed, so there may be no need for an extension of the
                          contract period.
                            The resident engineer’s records are vitally important when considering delay
                          claims. It is reasonable to allow a contractor some costs of disruption when he
                          has to change unexpectedly from one operation to another, but it is unreason-
                          able for him to leave his men doing nothing when there is work to get on with.
                          Also a contractor cannot allege he is delayed by ‘late receipt of engineer’s
                          drawings or instructions’ when he is in no position to do the work because he
                          is behind his programme, or his plant is broken down.
                            With respect to ‘exceptional adverse weather’ as a cause of unavoidable delay,
                          in the UK this usually means wet weather, including flooding, holding up cru-
                          cial earthwork constructions, such as embanking and road construction. A con-
                          tractor normally allows about 10 per cent time for ‘lost time’ due to weather in
                          the UK, but this depends on the nature of the works to be constructed. It should
                          be noted that, under ICE conditions, an extension of the contract period on
                          account of exceptional adverse weather, does not entitle a contractor to extra
                          payment on account of the delay; though if there are items in the bill of quanti-
                          ties payable per week or month, such as for the maintenance of the resident
                          engineer’s offices, these would continue to be payable for the extended contract
                          period.
                            The ECC conditions deal with weather by comparing actual weather condi-
                          tions experienced on site, with the weather data supplied and set out in the
                          contract. A ‘compensation event’ is then established if the weather conditions
                          experienced can be shown to have a frequency of less than once in 10 years,
                          that is, 1 in x years where x is greater than 10. As with all compensation events
                          under the ECC this may lead to adjustment of both prices and time for
                          completion.



                          17.11 Estimating delay costs


                          The cost which has to be evaluated due to delay to a contractor varies accord-
                          ing to whether or not the delay justifies an extension of the contract com-
                          pletion period. If the delay does not justify an extension of the completion
                          period, then the basic delay costs comprise such matters as standing time, lost
                          time, and ‘uneconomic working’ for labour and plant. These can occur when
                          the contractor has to stop work waiting for instructions, re-organize his work
                          to cope with unforeseen conditions, or having to move labour and plant onto
                          some other work available or as directed by the engineer. The ‘lost time’ by
                          men and machines can be identified and costed, on a similar basis to that set
                          out in Section 17.9.
   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243