Page 236 - pwc-lease-accounting-guide_Neat
P. 236

Sale and leaseback transactions



                       liability – $560,000 net carrying amount). The date of transfer of control is considered the lease
                       commencement date. However, if the seller-lessee classified the lease as a finance lease, no sale has
                       occurred and the transaction would continue to be accounted for as a failed sale and leaseback. See LG
                       6.3.4 for information on the impact of lease classification on qualification as a sale.



            6.5.1.3    Accounting by the seller-lessee when the leaseback is for a portion of the asset

                       When a failed sale and leaseback transaction involves a seller-lessee that leases back only a portion of
                       the asset, there are additional accounting considerations. Since the asset is not derecognized by the
                       seller-lessee, there may be leases associated with other portions of the asset. These leases must be
                       accounted for by the seller-lessee, and rental income should be imputed for the other leases, offset by
                       additional imputed debt service.

                       Example 6-15 illustrates how a seller-lessee should account for a leaseback of a portion of an
                       underlying asset when there are other leases in place.

                       EXAMPLE 6-15
                       Seller-lessee sells an asset and leases back a portion of the asset


                       A seller-lessee sells a shopping center in which it occupies the anchor store to a buyer-lessor and leases
                       back only its store location. Consider the following facts about this transaction:

                       □  The shopping center is one legal asset


                       □  The shopping center is sold at fair value and the leaseback rentals reflect market rental rates

                       □  The seller-lessee has a repurchase option

                       □  There are no alternative assets that are substantially the same and readily available in the
                          marketplace

                       How should the seller-lessee account for the sale and leaseback of the building?


                       Analysis

                       Because the seller-lessee has a repurchase option and there are no alternative assets that are
                       substantially the same and readily available in the marketplace, the transaction would not qualify for
                       sale accounting. It should be accounted for as a financing transaction. The net carrying amount of the
                       asset would remain on the seller-lessee’s books and the seller-lessee would continue to record annual
                       depreciation expense.

                       The cash proceeds received from the buyer-lessor would be recorded as a financial liability. The rental
                       payments made to the buyer-lessor for use of the anchor store would be re-characterized as debt
                       service on the financing. In addition, since the seller-lessee does not have use of the other stores
                       (which are retained on its balance sheet), it should impute rental income for the lease of the stores
                       offset by additional imputed debt service.

                       The transaction should not be accounted for as a partial sale and partial financing.






                                                                                                             6-29
   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241