Page 51 - International guidelines for groin hernia management
P. 51

Hernia

             In a high-risk environment (defined by a [ 5% inci-  performed via epidural, spinal and paravertebral routes.
           dence of wound infection) there is a significant benefit of  However, a discussion of paravertebral anesthesia is not
           antibiotic prophylaxis. Therefore, in institutions with high  included in this section since limited data are available on
           wound infection rates, antibiotic prophylaxis is highly  this technique.
           recommended. Furthermore, in these institutions the gen-  The ideal anesthetic technique: provides good periop-
           eral risk factors influencing wound infections should be  erative and postoperative analgesia, produces optimal
           checked (like hygiene routines, shaving on the day before  operating conditions by immobility, is associated with few
                                         608
           surgery and seroma aspiration, etc.).              complications, facilitates early patient discharge, and is
             It is a fact that in some countries prophylactic antibiotics  cost effective. The EHS guidelines on IH treatment rec-
           are a required indicator and considered a quality measure  ommends that local anesthesia be considered for all adult
           by Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services. Her-  patients with primary reducible unilateral IHs.
           niaSurge recommends these countries to reconsider this
           and adjust requirements to evidence-based guidelines.


































           Chapter 13                                         Evidence in literature
                                                              We identified one meta-analysis and five reviews com-
                                                                                          609–614
                                                              paring local to general anesthesia.  Of 17 randomized
           Anesthesia                                         trials found, 615–631  the most recent are included in the
                                                              reviews. 616, 620, 629  SIGN analysis of the 2009 meta-anal-
           A. R. Wijsmuller and P. Nordin                     ysis revealed methodological shortcomings. 610  One short-
                                                              coming was the performance of a meta-analysis on urinary
           Key question                                       retention despite heterogeneity between studies. In addi-
                                                              tion, urinary retention data from the largest RCT compar-
           KQ13.a Does local anesthesia influence outcomes after  ing general to local anesthesia were omitted. These omitted
           open repair of reducible inguinal hernia when compared  figures demonstrate a lower incidence of urinary retention
           with general or regional anesthesia?               after local anesthesia when compared with general anes-
                                                              thesia. 629  A more recent 2012 review did not perform a
           Introduction                                       meta-analysis because of included study design varia-
           General, regional and local anesthetic techniques are used  tion 611, 614  and found a lower incidence of urinary retention
           to facilitate open IH surgery. Regional anesthesia can be  following local anesthesia. 614





                                                                                                      123
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56