Page 52 - International guidelines for groin hernia management
P. 52

Hernia

             When compared with general anesthesia, local anes-  database analysis found lower reoperation rates following
           thesia is more cost effective when hospital and total  hernia repair by private hernia surgeons with uniform use
           healthcare costs are considered 632  and provides earlier  of local anesthesia when compared with primary IH repair
           patient mobilization and hospital discharge 614  Although  by general surgeons (possibly due to inexperience). They
           perioperative pain sensation is reported and can sometimes  concluded that local anesthesia use in a general hospital
           be a reason for conversion to general anesthesia, 619  early  might be a direct hernia recurrence risk factor, stressing the
           postoperative pain seems less in the local anesthesia  importance of experience in the administration of local
                614
           group.  Some randomized studies report no inter-group  anesthesia.
           difference in satisfaction or quality of life with respect to  Cardiovascular disease accounts for most of the mor-
                                                  614, 615, 617
           the operation and the first postoperative week.     tality associated with elective hernia repair (see Chap-
           Others report higher patient satisfaction with the anesthetic  ter 18). 243  Therefore, correctly performed local anesthesia
           technique  for   patients  randomized  to   local  might be preferable to regional and general anesthesia in
           anesthesia. 618, 620                               frail patients with severe systemic diseases (ASA class III).
             We identified five reviews 609, 611–614  and 11 randomized  An RCT has demonstrated that local anesthesia is associ-
           trials 618, 620, 624, 625, 629, 633–638  comparing local to spinal  ated with a superior ventilation and oxygenation pattern
           anesthesia. The most recent meta-analysis, published in  when compared with general and regional anesthesia. 635
           2012, 614  did not include one randomized trial of spinal
           versus local anesthesia. 634  The authors of this meta-anal-  Discussion, consensus, clarification of grading
           ysis performed an analysis with respect to urinary retention
           and found a lower incidence of urinary retention in local  Evidence strongly supports the idea that local anesthesia
                           614
           anesthesia patients.  The incidence of reported postop-  has several advantages over general or regional anesthesia
           erative pain varies, ranging from no difference to less early  in elective reducible IH repairs. As suggested by hernia
           postoperative pain after local anesthesia. 614  Two random-  database analysis, hernia recurrence may be more common
           ized trials reported no differences in postoperative nau-  following operation employing local anesthesia. Experi-
           sea. 618, 620  However, the largest randomized trial (with  ence in local anesthetic administration might negate this
           more subjects than the other two trials combined) reported  downside risk.
           less postoperative nausea in the local anesthetic group. 629  ASA class III patients undergoing IH repairs may ben-
           The majority of studies report faster hospital discharge  efit by the administration of local anesthetic over regional
           after local anesthesia. 614  Local is more cost effective than  or general anesthetic. However, the evidence for this
           spinal anesthesia when hospital and total healthcare  potential benefit is weak.
           expenditures are compared. 632  Crossover rates from local
           and regional anesthesia to general anesthesia strongly favor  Key question
           local anesthesia (1.9 versus 9.6%, respectively). 629
             Hernia registries provide insights into IH recurrence  KQ13.b Are outcomes different when open inguinal hernia
           risks with different anesthetic modalities. A Swedish Her-  repairs are performed with regional versus general or local
           nia Registry analysis of 59,823 patients found that local  anesthesia?
           anesthesia is associated with an increased risk of reopera-
           tion for recurrence after primary IH repair. 50  Using local  Introduction
           anesthesia as a reference, they reported reoperation relative
           risks of 0.76 and 0.79 for regional and general anesthesia,  The EHS Guidelines recommend against the use of spinal
                                                                                                     3
           respectively. A Danish Hernia Database analysis of 43,123  anesthesia in open anterior IH repairs in adults. They also
           patients reported an increased reoperation rate after local  cite general anesthesia with short-acting agents combined
           anesthesia versus general or regional anesthesia after  with local infiltration anesthesia as a valid alternative to
           direct—but not indirect—hernia repair. 77  The same  local anesthesia alone. 3
















           123
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57