Page 444 - EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.1A
P. 444

Pg: 444 - 14-Front 21-10-31

            In enemy territory, soldiers grabbed a Jewish woman, a physician
         by profession, intending to defile her. She screamed and pleaded that
         they leave her alone because she was married to a Kohen and would
         thus become prohibited to her husband forever. (Shulchan Aruch,
         Even Ha’ezer 6:8) As a physician, she gauged that she would respond
         [to this tragedy] by losing her sanity and committing suicide, for she
         would be unable to separate from her husband, who was the source
         of happiness in her life. Her single daughter, who was with her and
         who saw her mother’s distress, offered herself to the soldiers in order
         to prevent her parents’ lifelong separation, which she judged as en-
         dangering life, for she believed that her mother the physician knew
         herself well and that when she said she would be unable to continue
         living without her husband [she was not exaggerating], and danger to
         life sets aside the entire Torah, whereas she, the daughter, would be
         able to marry a Levi or Yisroel, just not a Kohen. Did the daughter act
         in accordance with halachah?

          ɳ	 Response to Question Two

         The Minchas Chinuch (Mitzvah 296:26) considers a case where a
         non-Jew forces a Jew to eat neveilah [non-slaughtered meat] in private
         and the Jew knows that were he to propose to the gentile that he eat
         food forbidden owing to one of the shmittah [the seventh year, when
         agricultural work is prohibited] prohibitions, which is less stringently
         forbidden than neveilah, the non-Jew will be satisfied. Should he pro-
         pose this or, since he is at present an annus [acting under compulsion]
         in regard to the neveilah he is allowed to eat it, whereas even though
         eating shmittah food is less stringent, since he is not being compelled
         to eat it, it remains forbidden and neither may he offer to eat it?

            We can learn from there that the girl may not offer to have rela-
         tions with a non-Jew, despite the fact that this would avoid a more
         serious transgression. Although this union would not be forbidden

                guished author. He told me that the question was put to the Rebbe of Stefanesht
                zt”l, and that he discussed it at length.

428  1  Medical-Halachic Responsa of Rav Zilberstein
   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449