Page 66 - EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.1A
P. 66

Pg: 66 - 3-Back 21-10-31

         nine months or of the second husband born after seven months. The
         three month wait clarifies this, for if she is carrying the first husband’s
         child it will certainly become recognizable during this period.] Tosfos
         ask how waiting three months removes all doubt about the child’s
         paternity, when it is possible that intercourse took place just prior
         to the husband’s death or the divorce and sperm fertilized an ovum
         three days later, therefore surely it would be proper to require a wait
         of three months and three days? Tosfos answer that we are uncon-
         cerned with these three days because we will know whose child she
         is carrying even without making the woman wait three more days. If
         she becomes visibly pregnant shortly after her remarriage she must
         be carrying the child of the first husband, whereas if she becomes
         recognizably pregnant two months after the wedding, it must be the
         child of the second husband, for if it belonged to the first husband it
         could not have remained unnoticed for five months.

            The Noda B’yehudah then cites a question posed by the Av Beis
         Din of Tartakove: although Tosfos’s answer resolves why a widow
         or divorcee need not wait ninety three days, the question remains
         difficult in regard to a yavam who must also wait ‘three months of
         discernment’ (Yevamos ibid., Shulchan Aruch Even Ha’ezer 164,1).
         Why should a yavam not have to wait ninety three days from the
         death of his brother, for perhaps his sister-in-law is pregnant from
         his brother and the reason that her pregnancy is not recognizable
         is because the sperm only fertilized the ovum three days later [and
         three full months have not yet passed since the pregnancy began]?
         By marrying his sister-in-law after just three months the yavam may
         therefore be transgressing the prohibition of having relations with a
         brother’s wife without the mitzvah [of yibum]. The Noda B’yehudah
         notes that this is an extremely serious question.

            The Noda B’yYehudah answers as follows. In the Torah it says,
         “When brothers dwell together and one of them dies without a child,
         the wife of the dead one shall not marry outside [the family] to an
         unrelated man; her husband’s brother shall come unto her and take
         her to him as a wife…” (Devarim 25:5). The gemara (Yevamos 35b)
         says, “If he left his wife pregnant and she gave birth she is exempt

50  1  Medical-Halachic Responsa of Rav Zilberstein
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71