Page 82 - EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.EFI-RAV ZILBERSTIN_VOL 8.1A
P. 82

Pg: 82 - 3-Back 21-10-31

         therefore be under no obligation to fulfill her late husband’s testa-
         ment. However, even if we decide that a woman who became pregnant
         through bathtub insemination may marry while pregnant or nursing,
         a woman who becomes pregnant as a result of artificial insemination
         will still be forbidden to remarry during that period, for in our times
         artificial insemination has become a commonplace procedure and it
         therefore falls within the purview of Chazal’s decree forbidding mar-
         riage with a woman who is either pregnant with or is nursing another
         man’s child. Therefore, since she will be unable to remarry [until after
         the child’s birth and after twenty four months of nursing], she is not
         obligated to fulfill her late husband’s testament, as explained above.

            The Kovetz Shiurim (Kesuvos 203) writes, “From Rabbenu
         Chananel’s commentary to Chagigah 16, it is clear that a woman who
         became pregnant in a bathtub does not become impure upon giving
         birth, because the Torah says,“A woman who is inseminated and gives
         birth to a male shall be impure... and on the eighth day the flesh of his
         foreskin shall be circumcised” (Vayikra 12:2-3). The Torah is speaking
         about a natural birth, not a birth that comes about unnaturally [i.e. as
         a result of bathtub insemination]. It is therefore questionable wheth-
         er the circumcision of such a child sets aside Shabbos, for the bris of
         a boy born by Cesarean section does not set Shabbos aside because
         his mother does not become impure from childbirth, as Rashi writes
         (Bechoros 47b) because it is written,“when she gives birth she shall be
         impure.” This implies that she becomes impure only if she gives birth
         in the normal manner, and not through a surgical procedure.

            However, the Kovetz Shiurim continues as follows: “It is clear
         though, that this case [of pregnancy resulting from bathtub insem-
         ination] depends wholly upon the time and the place, just as we find
         with forbidden work on Shabbos. [For example,] if one takes an
         object from a private domain to a public domain in the crook of his
         elbow, he is exempt from punishment because this is not the usual
         manner of carrying something outside during the week. However,
         if the general practice changes and it becomes usual for everyone
         to carry things in the crook of their elbows, a person will certainly
         incur punishment for doing so on Shabbos too. Now, the practice

66  1  Medical-Halachic Responsa of Rav Zilberstein
   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87