Page 102 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 102

THE  ANTELOPE'S  HEAD                89

             Namuchi, as given in the ~igveda and interpreted on the supposition
             that  the  year  began  with  the  Dog-star,  does,  however,  solve  the
             difficulty.  I  have  already  alluded  to  the  fact  that in  the  ~igveda
             Vritra is often said to appear in the form of a M riga  ( :tUg. i. 80. 7;
             v.  32,  3; v.  34. 2; viii. 93. 14 ).  In  ~ig.  vii.  19.5 Vritra and Namuchi
             are both said to be killed by Indra, and though this cannot be taken
             as  a  direct  authority  for  holding  that  V ritra  and  Namuc.hi  are
             the different forms  of the same enemy, yet from  the description of
             the  two  I  do  not  think  there  can  be  any  doubt as  to  their  being
             identical. In fact,  Shu~h~a. Pipru, Kuyava and Namuchi* are only
             so  many  different  names  of the  enemy  of Indra.  Now  Indzr  is
             represented  as cutting off the head of Vritra ( {tig.  i.  52.  10) !and
             also of Namuchi  ( ~ig. v.  30.  7; vi. 20.  6 ).  Combining these _$tate-
             ments  we  get  that  Indra cut  off the  head  of Vtitra or  N~uchi,
             in  the  form  of a  MJiga;  and  this  at  once  suggests  the ;question
             whether that head  is  not the  same as that  of Praj&~ti cut off  by
             Rudra and which gave the name of M riga-shir!!ha, or' the antelope's
             head  ' to the constellation. In  ~ig i. 53.  7, we  are simply told  that
             Namuchi was killed by Indra in the distant ( para}·ati) region, which
             seems to mean the region of Yama. But as it does not satisfactorily
             determine  the  place  where  Namuchi  was  killed,  I  refer  to {tig. x.
             73.  7,  where  Indra by  killing  Namuchi is  said  to have cleared  up
             ' the  paths  leading  ( yana  in  the  original )  to  the  ( region  of)
             Devas;'t  which  plainly  shows  that  Namuchi  was  killed  at  the
             gates of the Devayana. In the Vajasneyi Salllhit& 10.  14 a  sacrificial
             rite is described which gives the same place and time  of Namuchi's
             death. The priest there throws away a piece of metal hidden  under
             a tiger hide,  exclaiming, 'the head  of  Namuchi  is  thrown  away,'
             after  he  has  taken  his  Yajamana  through  all  directions  ( East,
             South, West, North and upwards ) and also through all the seasons
             ( Vasanta,  Gri4hma,  Sharad,  Var~hi and  Hemanta-and-Shishira)
             This  means,  if it  can  mean  anything,  that  Namuchi  alias  Vritra
             was  killed,  in  the  language  of seasons,  after  Shishira,  or in  other

                 •  See l'rof.  Bloomfield's contributions  to  the  Interpretation of  the
             Veda·-in  the Journal of the American OrieRtal  Society,  Vol. XV, p.  q6.
                 t  The original ...-erse  is as follows  :-
                       .~ ~~~~~~·~Wit~ ~I
                       ~ ~ ~ ~'11~-it ~q ~~~
   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107