Page 131 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 131

116           SAMAGRA  TILAK- 2  •  THE  ORION

            tells  us  that  a  hunter  by  name  Orion  was  transformed  after  J;Us
            death into this constellation which consequently came to be called
            after  him.  But this is  surely no satisfactory explanation.  Who is
            the  hunter  that  was  so  transformed  ?  There  are  many  mytholo-
            gical  proper names in Greek  which can be traced  back  to  their
            Aryan  originals, and why should Orion be not similarly derived  ?
            The  story  obviously  points to  the  Vedic  legends  of. Rudra,  who
            is  said  to  be  still  chasing  Prajapati  in  the  heavens.  The  Vedic
            legend  has  fully  preserved  all  the three elements  in  the  story-
            the  hunter  Rudra,  the  dog  and  the  antelope's  head,  while  the
            Greeks appear to have retained  only the hunter and the dog with
            nothing to hunt  ! But  that does not preclude  us  from  discovering
            the identity  of these legends and the question is whether  we  can
            suggest a Sanskrit word which will  give us Orion according to the·
            already  established  phonetic rules.  I  know  of no  name  of Rudra
            from  which  Orion  can  be so derived. But if we look to the names
            of contellation  of  Mrigashiras,  we  may,  I  think  in  the  absence
            of any better suggestion provisionally derive  Orion from Sanskfit
             ~                                                      .
            Agrayal}a the original of Agrahayana; the initial long a in Sanskrit
            may  be  represented  by omega in Greek as  in Sk.  ama,  Gk. omos,
            Sk. ashu,  Gr. okus,  and  the last  word ayarUJ  may  become  ion  in
            Greek.  It is  not, however,  so  easy  to  account  for  the  dropping
            of g  before  r  in  the  body  of  the  word.  Comparison  of Sk.
            grrivan  with  Gk.  laos  and  of Sk.  ghrdrJa  with  Gk.  ris,  rinos,
            shews  that the  change  may  take  place  initially,  but  scholars
            whom I have  consulted think  that there is  no  instance  in  which
            it takes place  medially  between  Greek and  Sanskrit,  though  such
            changes  are  not  rare  between  other  languages  as  in Old  Irish
            ar,  Cymric  ear,  which  K.  Brugmann•  derives  from  agra.  Also
            compare  Gk.  dakru,  Goth.  tagr,  Old  Irish  der,  English  tear;
            Latin  exagmen, examen, 0.  Ir.  am  from  the  root  aj.  I  do  not
            feel  myself  competent to  decide  the  question  and  hence  must
            remain content  with  simply  throwing  out  the  suggestion  for
            what  it is worth.  I have shewn that traditional coincidences clearly

               •  Comp. Gram., Vol.  1, Arts.  518-523.  Prof.  Max  Mi!ller  extends
            the  rule  to  Greek  and  Latin,  see  his  lectures  on  the  Science  of
            Language,  Vol.  II,  p.  309,  where  several  other  instances  are  given
           For a  full  statement  of  the  phonetic  difficulties  in  identifying  Gk.
           01ion  with  Sk.  /ig,l}'fl1J•I,  see App. to this essay.
   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136