Page 377 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 377

162       SAMAGRA  TILAK- 2  •  THE  ARCTIC  HOME

            to be differently  named.  Plutarch  has,  therefore,  rightly  observed
            that "  we  have  a  proof in  the name of the last (month ) that the
            Roman year contained, at first ten months only and not twelve.  "*
            But  if there  was  any  doubt  on  the  point  it  is  now  removed  by
            the analogy of the Gavam-ayc.nam and the legends of the Dashagvas
            and Dirghatamas. Macrobius ( Saturnal Lib.  1 Chap. 12)  confirms
            the  story  of  Numa's  adding  and  not  simply  transposing,  two
            months  to  the  ancient  year  of ten  months.  What  the  A vesta  has
            to say on this subject we  shall see later on where traditions about
            tbe  ancient year amongst the  other Aryan  races  will  also  be con-
            sidered.  Suffice  it to  say  for  the present  that,  according  to  tradi-
            tion,  the  ancient  Roman  year  consisted  only  of ten  months,  and
           like the duration of the Garam-ayanam, it was subsequently chang-
            ed  into  a  year of twelve  months;  and  yet,  so  far  as  I  know,  no
            reason  has  yet  been  discovered,  why  the  Roman  year  in  ancient
            times  was  considered  to be  shorter by  rwo  months.  On  the  con-
            trary,  the  tendency  is  either  to  explain  away  the  tradition  some
            how  as  inconvenient,  or  to  ignore  it  altogether  as  incredible.
            But so long as the word  December is before us and we  know  how
           it  is  derived,  the  tradition  cannot  be  so  lightly  set  side.  The
           Encyclopredia  Britanica  ( s.  v.  calendar )  records  the  ancient
           tradition  that  the  oldest  Roman  year  of  Romulus  was  of  ten
           months  of 304  days  and  observes  "  it  is  not  known  how  the
           remaining  days  were  disposed  of.  "  If,  with  all  the  resources.of
           modern  science  at  our  command,  we  have  not  yet been  able  to
           ascertain  why  rh<!  oldest  Roman  year  was  of  tell  months  only
           and  how  the  remaining  days  were  disposed  of,  we  need  not be
           surprised  if  the  Taittiriya  Samhita  refrained  from  speculating
           on  the  point  and  contented  itself with  stating  that  such  was  the
            ' path '  or the  old  custom  or practice handed  down  from  genera-
           tion  to  generation  from  times  immemorial.  The  Arctic  theory,
           however,  now  throws  quite  a  new  light  on  these  ancient  tradi-
           ticms,  Vedic as  well  as  Roman;  and if we  take the  Gal'am-ayanam
            of ten  months and the  old Roman  year  of  ten  months  as  relics
           of the  period when the ancestors of both these races  lived  together
           within  the  circum-polar  regions,  there  is  no  difficulty  of  explain-
           ing  how  the  remaining  days  were  disposed  of.  It was  the  period

               ~Se e Plutarch's Lins:  translated  into  English  by  the  Rev.  John
           and \Yilliam  Langhorn e  (  \\"arct.  Loc!-:  &  Co.  ) ,  p.  54, f.
   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382