Page 434 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 434

VEDIC  MYTHS-THE  CAPTIVE  WATERS         215
          Thus  in  Ill,  53,  5,  we  read,  "  0  Maghavan  !  0  brother Indra  !
          go beyond  (para )  and  come  hither  ( a)  you  are wanted  in  both
          places ( ubhayatra ) ... "  The passages,  where Savitri is described  as
          going,  round  the night on both sides  is  already referred to above.
              With  these  passages  before  us,  we  cannot  reasonably  hold
          that  the  Vedic  bards  were  ignorant  of  the  lower  celes6al
          hemisphere,  as  supposed  by  Wallis,  and  some  other  scholars.
          Nor is the hypothesis a priori probable, for I have shown elsewhere
          that the Vedic  bards  knew  enough  of astronomy  to calculate the
          movements  of the  sun  and  the  moon  tolerably  correct  for  all
          practical  purposes;  and  the  people,  who  could  do  this,  could
          not be supposed to be so ignorant as to believe that  the  sky  was
          nailed  down  to  the  earth  at  the  celestial  horizon,  and  that
          when the sun was  not seen during the night,  he must  be  taken  to
          have  disappeared  somewhere in the upper  regions  of the heaven.
          The passage from the Aitareya Bnlhmapa (III, 44) which is quoted
          by Wallis, and which tells us that the sun, having  reached  the  end
          of the day,  turns round as  it were,  and  makes  night  where  there
          was  day before and day  on the  other side,  and  vice  versa,  is  very
          vague  and  does not prove that the sun  was  believed  to  return by
          night through a  region,  which is  somewhere in the upper  heaven.
          The words used in the original are avastat and parastat; and Dr.
          Haug correctly translates parastat by ' what is on the other side. ',
          Muir  and  others,  however,  interpret parastat  to  mean  'upper',
          thus giving rise to the hypothesis that the sun returns during night
          by  a  passage  through  the  upper  region  of  the  heaven.  But  in
          the face of the express passages in which regions below and  above
          all the three earths are unmistakably mentioned,  we Ca.nnot accept
          a  hypothesis  based upon  a  doubtful translation  of a  single  word.
          It is  a  hypothesis  that  has  its  origin  either  in  the  preconceived
          notion  regarding  the  primitive  man,  or  in  a  desire  to  import
          into  the  Vedas  the  speculations  of  the  Homeric  cosmography.
          The  knowledge  of the  Vedic  bards  regarding  the  nether  world
          may  not have been  as  exact  as  that  of the  modern  astronomers,
          and  we,  therefore,  meet  with  such  questions  in  the  ~ig-Veda
          (I,  35, 7) as  "Where  is  St1rya  now  (after sunset)  and  which
          celestial  region  his  rays  now  illumine  ? "  But  there  is  enough
          explicit  evidence  to  prove  that  the  Vedic  people  knew  of the
          existence of a  region below the earth and if some of their notions
   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439