Page 56 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 56

43

             Vedic days must be taken to denote the asterisms  known by such
             names. If Indian  priests  are to  be supposed  incapable  of making
             any  accurate observations  of solstitial points in  1200  B.  C., •  it is
             to  my  mind  utterly  inconsistent  and  illogical  to  hold  that  the
             forefathers of these priests, when they assigned the vernal equinox
             to  the  Krittikas,  understood  the word  to mean  the  asterism  but
             the imaginary  beginning  of the  zodiacal  portion of that name.  I
             -cannot  also  understand  why  scholars  should  hesitate  to  assign
             the Vedic works to the same period of antiquity which they allow
             to the Chinese and the Egyptians.t  But it is needless here to enter
             into this controversy.  For if I once  succeed in  showing,  as I  hope
             to do, that there is sufficient internal evidence in the Vedic literature
             itself  of a still remoter antiquity, all theories, conjectures and guesses,
             which  have  the  effect  of unduly  reducing  the  antiquity  of  the
             Vedic  works  and  also  of throwing  discredit  upon  the  claims  of
             the Indians to the origin of the Nak,hatra system,  will  require no
             refutation.
                 Bentley,  however,  takes  his  stand  on  a  different  ground.  He
             suggests that the word Vishtlkha, like Vida/d;;t may mean "possessed
             of two  branches,"  and  that  these  two  branches  may  have  been
             caused  by the equinoctial colure bisecting the zodiacal  portion  of
             the  VishAkhas.  Now  the  equinoctial  colure  passing  through  the
             beginning  of the  divisional  KrittiUs naturally bisects the zodiacal
             portion  of  the  VisbakhA.  Bentley,  therefore,  concludes,  without
             any  more  proof than  this  etymological  conjecture,  that  this  was
             the  position  of the colure when  Vishakhl received its name.  This
             is  no  doubt  an  ingenious  hypothesis.  But  there  is  not  only  no
             evidence in the Vedic works to support su~h etymological specula·

                 •  See Pref. ,to \lig., voi.IV,~p. xxill.
                 t  M.  Biot allows it in  the case of the  Chinese  and  considers  that
             the Hindus borrowed  the Nakthatra system from  them.  Albtrunt, in his
             chronology of ancient nations, etc.,  observes  thac·  other  nations  begia
             their asterisms with the Pleiades. He further states that he  has  found
             ia some books of Hermes  that  the  vernal  equinox  coincides  with  the
             Tiling ol rleiades, but, says  be' God knows  best  what they intend! J
                 t Tbi~•example has been added by Prof. Max Milller. See  Pref.  to
             ~~· VoJ.  IV,  p.  Jitn.  See  aJio  Bentley's  Historical  v1ew  of  Hindu
             Astrenomy, p. 2.
   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61