Page 60 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 60

CHAPTER  IV

                              "
                                        "
                              AGRAHAYANA
               Phllgunl  full-moon,  the  new  year's  ~ight-S!yaQa's  explanation
           unsatisfactory-Ph!lguna  could  not  be  a  Vasanta  month-Two  fold
           character of the seasons, lunar and solar, superfluous-Discussion  of a
           passage in Shushruta-Bhlskara Bhatta's explanation.  Winter  solstice
           on the full-moon  in PhAlguna-The  position  of  other  cardinal  points
           Vernal  equinox  m  Mrigashiras-Agrahaya i-Native Lexicographers
                                               11
           explanation  of  the  word-Grammatically  objectionable-Its  real
           meaning  according  to  Pll.Qini-Erroneous  rank  of  Mlrgllfhirsha
           amongst  months  according  to  the  Bbagavad  Gitl  and  Amara-
           Mil.rg8fhirsha  could not have been the first  month  of  the  solstitial  or
           the eqUJnottial year- It leads  to libration of the  equinoxes-Possible
           renon of  -the  libration  theory-Mriguhiras-Agrah~y~a or  the  first
           Nak,hatra in ,the year-M(lla, its  prtmary  m&ning-Evidence  of  the
           summer solstice occurring In  ~hldrapada-Origin of the  annual  feasts
           to  the manes amongst Hindus and Parsis- Comparison of the primitive
           Hindu and Parsi calendar-Summary of result~.

               THE  passage  from  the  Taittirtya  Sruphita quoted in  the  last
           chapter  states  that  the  Chitra  and Phalguni full-moons  were  the
           begiimings  of the  year,  which  then  commenced  with  the  winter
           solstice  in  the  month  of Magha.  The  words  used  in  the  original
           are  Chitra-[J'Urna-masa  and Phalgun£-pU,rna-masa and these must be
           understood to . denote,  not the  Chaitra ~nd the Philguna months,
           whether  sidereal  and  synodical,  as  Prof.  Weber  seems  to have,  in
           one--a~sed, but the full-moon days in each of these months.
           This is evident ir<nn  e fact that these have been recommended as
           alternative times for the c   encement of the satra in opposition
           to  the  Ekiithtaka  day.  In the  case of the Phalgun£-/)UrlJil-mdsa we
           are further told that Vi~Jht1van coup.tedJrom that time falls during
           the  rainy  season,  and  it  is  impossible  to  suppose  that Vithdvan
           can be counted from a month. The whole context, therefore, .shows
           that it is a discussion as  to  the  particular  day  best  suited  to com-
           mence the yearly sacrifice, and that Chitra-/)Ur~Ja-masa and Phalgun£-
           /)Url}a-masa  must  mean  the  days  when  the  moon  is  full  near  the
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65