Page 64 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 64

"
                                         "
                                   AGRAHAYA~A                     51
           he added imm~tely ~fer it a  second  paragraph  describing  the
           seasons as he saw· theui.  The words  "but here'"  at its beginning,
           the assignment of four months to the rainy season,  but under two
           different names of PrAvti•h and Varshl, to keep up the old number
           of the seasons, and the absence of any reference to the  ilyanas, the
           year  and  the  lustrum  described  in  the  previous  paragraph-all
           point to the conclusion that the second paragraph is  of later origin
           and inserted with a view only to note the changes  in the occurrence
           of events  described  in  the  paragraph  next  preceding it.  It might
           be contended that the second paragraph is  that of Shushruta, who
           notices the old order of things in the first.  But  I  need not go into
           that question here.  For in either case it is  plain  that the passage
           wherein  PhA.lguna  and Chaitra are assigned  to Vasanta is the pro-
           duction of a later writer, whosoever he may be  whether  Shushruta
           or any one else,  and as far  as  our  present  inquiry  is  concerned
           we cannot take the passage as an authority for holding that Phalguoa
           was a  Vasanta month in the days of the Taittirtya SaiPhita. I may
           however  remark,  that Vagbha\11  who  professes  to  summarise  the
           works  of Shushruta and Charaka gives  the .order  and  description
           of seasons as we find it in the first paragraph in Shushruta •  with·
           out alluding  to  the  changes  noted  in  the  second  paragraph.  We
           may  therefore,  suppose that either the paragraph did  not exist in
           Vagbhara's time or that he did not regard it as genuine.
               There  is  thus  no  reliable  authority,  that  I  am  aware  of,  for
           holding that PhA.lguna,  in the days  of the Taittirtya Sa~p.hita, was
           a  Vasanta month, and SAyapa's  explanation  does  not  in  conse-
           quence  bold  good  at least in this case. The explanation is further
           inconsistent  with  the  fact  that  in  several  Br4hma¥s  and  Sfttras
           the full-moon night in the month of Ph4lguna has been pronounced
           to  be  the first  night  of the year.  The  Shatapatha  Br4hmapa  ( vi.
           2.  2.  18 )  says  "  the  Ph4lgunt  full-moon  is  the  first  night  of the
           year. ".The  Taittirtya  ( i. 1. 2, 8) and  the  S&nkhyAyana  ( iv.  4,
           and 4.  1 )t  BrAhmatras contain similar passages,  while the Gopatha


               •  J\thtlngahridaya  SOtrasthAna  iii.  I,  "'fT~~i~i): ~I
           ~:~:1~)s~ ...  1"
               t  ~ { ~ SNliT  \t~~~.fl ~ Shat. Br. ,.,.  2.  2.  18 ~~
           ._ SNliT \1~: S~ ~ qjli!]i11t ~ ta:lf flll~lfti'~ 1 ·H~ iffil~l<t:_  ~fa I
           Taitt. Br.  1.  r.  2.  8,  ~ ~~lit~~ ~~1 qivt.rr~ I  5An.  Br.  iv. 4·
   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69