Page 67 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 67

S4            SAMAGM  'I'iLAK- 2  •  THE  OIUON

          to the PhAlgunt ftjll-noon in the V6dic works are mere conjectures
          81ld guesses of his own.  I  admit that even the guesses of a  scholar
          like Siylll:Ul deserve  consideration.  But when  on a  closer exami-
          nation we  find  that they  ace  n()t supported by  ~y old traditions
          and  are  beside$  objectionable  on  various  other gounds, I think
          we  are  bound  to  reject  them.  As Qbserved  by  BbAskara  Bha~
          the passage in the Taittirtya &hpbiti must therefore, be understood
          as referriJig.to an older year beginning.  and  we must hold that the
          full-moon in PhAlguna did  as a matter of fact once commence the
          year at the winter solstice.  I know that this view has been reprded
          as improbable by some scholars, on the sole grouJ;ld that it would,
          if substantiated,  enhance  the  antiquity  of the  Vedic  works  by
          about 2000 years more than what these scholan are willing to apign
          to them; and as  the natural result of such prepossessions amongst
          them the  subject has till now remained uninvestipted. But I  hope
          that they will patiently examine the evidence, direct and con-obora-
          tive,  which "I intend to put forth in support of the suggestion and
          then give their judgement upon it. There is no a priori impossibility
          involved in the hypothesis that the old priests, after changing their
          starting point to the Krittikis and framing the calendar accordingly
          continued to recognize for sacrificial purposes,  the older positions
          of the Nak,hatras,  just as  all Brihma11-as  from  the Himalaya  to
          the Cape Comorin at present perform their sacrifices on days and
          at times fixed when the vernal equinox was in the Krittikis. I think
          the present Brahmal)aS are worse  off in this respect,  inasmuch as
          they have not even the  liberty,  which the passage in the Taittirtya
          Sa!llhiti accorded, though hesitatingly, to the old priests, of choos-
          ing either the old or the new calendar. To use the words of Professor
          Max MUller we must in such cases,  therefore,  ' keep our  precon-
           ceived  notions  of what  people  call  primitive  humanity  in  abey-
           ance for a  time'•  and form our judgement of antiquity, as we  do
           of  other  facts,  solely ·upon  evidence.
              We have seen in the hist chapter that the evidence for placing
           the vernal equinox in the KpttikAs consisted of ( 1 ) the lists of the
           Nak,hatras  all  beginn;ng  with  the  Krittikas,  ( 2 ) the  winter
           solstice  then  falling  in the  month of Migha, ( 3) the  Nak,hatra
           at the summer solstice being presided over by the pitris, and ( 4) ·
           the  possibility  of considering,  as  Bentley  suggested,  the  portion
              •Iadia :what lt oaa teach us? p.  112.
   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72