Page 655 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 655

8         SAMAGRA  TILAK - 2  •  VEDIC  CHRONOLOGY
          lines  of each division.  This  is  the  sphere  adopted  and described
          in  all  the  ancient  astronomical  Siddhil.ntas.  Now  Indian  lunar
           months  are  named  after  the  fixed  Nak~hatras at  or  near which
           the  moon is  full  during  that month;  e.  g.,  the  month is  named
           Chaitra  or  Kartika according  as  the full  moon  in the  month is
           found  to  be  near  the  star  Chitra  or  the  KrittikAs  respectively;
           and the rule is older  than  Pa~ini. The Indian  lunar  month thus
           becomes tied down to a fixed  star, or a fixed  divisional  Nak~hatra
           portion  of the  ecliptic.  But  the  winter  and  summer  solstitial
           points  as  well  as  the  equinoxes  on which  the  seasons  depend
           never  remain  fixed  in  the  ecliptic.  They  have  a  slow  backward
           motion,  so  slow  that it amounts  only about fifty  seconds  a  year
           or one degree in about 72  years. This is  known as  the precession
           of the  equinoxes,  and  it  causes  the  solstices  to  sweep  over  the
           whole  circle  of the  ecliptic  once  in 26,000  years in round  num-
           bers.  The  seasons  must therefore,  also  sweep through all  the  In•
           dian lunar months, once in that period.  Thus if the lunar  months
           Chaitra and  Vaishil.kha  corresponded  with the  season  of  spring
           ( Vasanta )  at  any  time,  this  season  in  course  of time  is  bound
           to fall back in the preceding lunar months. But, if instead of tieing
           down the divisional  Nak~hatras to a fixed  portion of the ecliptic,
           we  count  our  Nak~hatras ( divisional )  from  the moveable  sol-
           stices  or equinoxes,  the  lunar months,  named  after them,  would
           never  cease  to  correspond  with  the  seasons  at  first  represented
           by them.  By adopting this moveable  zodiac  the  names  of  the
           months  will  have  no  connection  whatever  with  the fixed  stars;
           in  other  words,  they  will  be  simply  arbitrary or  conventional.
           But  some  astronomical  reformers  amongst  us  advocated  this
           course instead  of making  the  seasons  shift  back  through all  the
           ,months  in  26,000  years.  On  our side  Lele,  Modak  and  Shankar
           "Balkri~h~a Dik~hit were its chief advocates and  they termed them-
           selves  Sayan-·V adis  or  Sayanists,  the  word  Sdyana  denoting  a
           preference  to  the  precessional  motion ( Ayana )  of the Solstices.
           On  the  other  the lmajority  of  astronomical  scholars, - e.  g.
           Chhatre,  Bapudevsbastri,  and  now  Pan!fit  Sudbakar Dwivedi-
           were of opinion that we should abide by the fixed  zodiac mention.,
           ed in the Siddbantas and adopt a siderial sphere, accounting from
           a  fixed  point.  These  an!  called  Nirayana-Vadis  or  Nirayanists.
           But if the fixed  zodiac is to be retained it was  necessary to  show
           how the problem about the shifting of the seasons is to be solved.
   650   651   652   653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660