Page 684 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 684

"
            36         SAMAGRA  TILAK - 2  •  VEDANGA  JYOTI'HA
            93 = 84  + 9=7 dozens ( ~r:) and 9  odd  ( ~= ) and  then
            calculates NaktJhatra-amshas first for the dozens and  then  for  the
            remaining or  the  una-pakshas  as  it  calls  them.  One  operation
            is  thus  split  into  two  subordinate  parts  in  order  to cut short
            the  labour  of arithmetical calculation.  For,  as  the  amshas  at the
            end  of a dozen pakshas are found  to be always  equal to 8 or the
            corresponding multiples of that number, ( if we omit the complete
            Nak~hatras, that is,  the multiples  of 124 amshas from the total),
            it is  obviously easier to get the amshas at  the  end  of any  dozen
            pakshas  by  multiplying  the  dozens  by  8,  than  by  multiplying
            by  11  the  total  number  represented  by  the  said  dozens.  But  in
            this case it is  necessary to say how the amshas for  the pakshas in
            excess  of a dozen, i. e., the una-pakshas are to be counted;  other-
            wise  the  rule  would  remain  incomplete,  that  is,  inapplicable
            to any given number of pakshas in general. Taking  all  these things
            into  consideration  and  changing  ~~o into  ~~o I would,
            therefore, read the verse as follows  :-

                           $:n: ~: mi: ~~~lit<hl«al: 1
                          ll:Cfil~~~tair.l': ~sit ~~ ~~ II
            and  without  any  strained  anvaya  translate :- ' the  ( parvan )
            Nak~hatra amshas  should  be  made  by  ( that is,  counted) groups
            of  eight,  ( each )  arising  out  of  ( each )  dozen  ( ~)
            pakshas,  and  by  (adding to  it) the  eleven-fold  of the  excess  re-
            maining  ( 3iii ) ;  and  again  ( add )  half  ( the  NaktJhatra-am-
            shas i.  e.  62) in the case of the  bright ( paksha ),  if  the  moon's
            amshas (therein are required). '  The first  three lines of the verse
            give  a  general  rule,  which is  applicable  both to the  Sun  and  the
            Moon,  while  the  last  line  states,  by  way  of an  exception,  the
            change  necessary  to  be made  therein  if the  Moon's  amshas,  at
            the  end  of  a  bight fortnight,  are  alone  required.  For  example,
            suppose, we  have to find the Nak~hatra-amshas at the end of 93rd
            parvan.  Here 93  = 7  dozens  and 9 odd  ( una ).  Therefore the am-
            shas are equal  to  7 x 8 + 9 x 11  =56+ 99  = 155,  or,  deducting  124
            therefrom,  31  only.  These  are  the  parvan-amshas  in general.  But
            93rd  is  a  bright  paksha;  and  if the  Moon's  amshas  alone  are
            required, we must add 62 to the above  result; for  then  the Moon
            is in opposition to the Sun,  that is, 13! NaktJhatras apart,  or if we
            compare the  Nakthatra-amshas  only,  she  has  62  more  am.shas
            than the  Sun.  A complete table of the parvan-amshas for  all  124
   679   680   681   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689