Page 687 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 687

CRITICISM  AND  SUGGESTIONS            39
          Sanskrit  grammar,  numerals  like  ~ are  declined  in  the
          singular  number,  even  when  they  are  in  apposition. to  a  plural
          noun.  The  same grammar,  however,  teaches  us  that  these  nume-
          rals  are  used  also  to  denote  independent  numbers,  and  that  the
          plural  form  is  not  only  correct,  but  necessary  when  the
          speaker  wishes  to  indicate  ' many  or  several  groups '  thereof.
          For instance,  if we  want  to  denote  ' several  groups  of  twenty',
         fctw~: is  the  proper  form  to  be  used.  Without  supplying  <n~r:
         or  <nrnr:  as  understood,  I  would,  therefore,  take  f~: as  an
         independent  numeral  in  accusative  plural,  governed  by  the  verb
         ~ and qualified by the adjective  '3i<'l~flrer:  used  here  not in  the
         nominative,  but  in  the  accusative  case.  This  construction  is
          at  once  simple  and  natural.  It  is  necessary  further  to  note  in
                      0
         contrast with  ~rit <nr~Y:  in  the first  half of the verse  we  have,  in
         the  second   0  ~Tif  ~\l. evidently  meaning  that  here  fu:ffill~'s  are
         not to be substituted  for  ( <nr~[: ),  but  added  to  something  else.
         Thus  the  line  means  that  'one  should  raise  up,  that  is,  increase
         ( the  figure)  in  the  place  of ~ by  ( as  many)  seventy-two's
         ( as  are) equal  in measure to  the  ~ (number).'  For  example,
          uppose  we  wish to  a  certain the  time  (in kalas) of the Moon's
         entry into the last Nakeyhatra  at the end  of 18  pakshas. Here 18  is
         equal  to  one  dozen  plus six  ( '3iii)  pak has.  The  kallis  at  the
         end  of one dozen pakshas, are equal  to  19  according to first  half
         of the  verse.  What  remains is  to find  out  the  number of  kahis,
         required  to  be  added  to  the  above  result  on  account  of  the  six
         additional (una)  pakshas.  For  this  purpose  the  Vedanga  now
         directs us  to raise up the a:;;:r  Number, here equal to 6, by  as many
         72'  as  are  equal  to  the  a:;;:r  Number  itself,  that  is  by  6 x 72  in
         the  present case. We thus get 6 + 6 x 72. Bllt 6 + 6 x 72 = 6 ( 1 + 72)
          = 6 x 73;  or  genera11y  n + 72n  = 73n.  Therefore  the  rule  practi-
         cally  comes  to  mean that  the  una  number  should  be  multiplied
         by  73.  The  result,  be  it  remembered,  does  not  give  us  the
          number of  the  required  kaliis.  It  is  only  the  first  or  the  pre-
         liminary  step  in  the  calculation  required  to  be made  for  that
         purpose.  The  moon  traverses  1809  Nak~hatras in  124  pakshas,
         that is,  14.f14  Nak~hatras during one paksha. Or one may say  that
         over  and  above  14  complete  Nak~hatras she  traverses  a  fraction
         of  a  Nak~hatra equal  to 73  amshas  per paksha.  Therefore,  in  a
         given  number of una pakshas, this fractional  part of a  Nak~hatra
         or the  01'~ of  the Moon,  as  it  may  be  fitly  termed,  would,  in
   682   683   684   685   686   687   688   689   690   691   692