Page 729 - Lokmanya Tilak Samagra (khand 2)
P. 729

I   •    "   "'
                           A  MISSING  SANKHY A  X:ARIKA         81
          Chinese.  ( 2 ) But our present  text  contains  72  verses  and  when
          the  last  three  are  excluded  as  giving  only  ~. there
          remain  only  69  ver  es  for  the  doctrinal part of  the  book.  ( 3)
          The  Bhd~hya of Gau~apada,  the  +il6~~. and  the  commentary
          translated into Chinese all contain lengthy and substantially similar
          discussions  on  verse  61,  explaining why  in  that  verse  ~ is
          called ~+il~d~. ( 4) In  these  discussions  there  are  words  which
          indicate  that  the  discussion  must  have  been  originally  based
          on a  verse in the text,  and is  not  an  exposition  given  merely by
          the  commentators.  And  ( 5 ) an essential  characteristic  of  the
          Sankhya doctrine  will  be  wanting  in the Karikas if the  work be
          supposed to consist in its doctrinal part of only  69  verses. If we
          put all these facts together we  are led to infer that originally there
          was one verse between the 6lst and the 62nd (in Wilson's edition )
          and that if reconstructed  from what look like  excerpts from  it in
          the old commentaries  it would run thus -
                      ~~~~tR~!{ll
                      smt:~~~:~:~~ II
              I have stated above that it is an essential part of the Sankhya
          doctrine  not  to  recognise  any  cause  of  the  world  subtler  than
          Prakriti :  neither  Ishvara,  [nor  Puru~ha, nor  Kala  ( time ),  nor
          again  Svabhava  ( nature ) ;  and  that  the  subject  is  noticed  twice
          in the  old  commentaries  on  the  Karikas,  once  in explaining  the
          27th verse and  again in the commentary  on  the  61st  verse.  It is
          interesting in this connection to note that the Arab writer Alberuni
          quoting from}l  Sankhya book in the form  of a  dialogue,  dwells
          upon  the  same  essential  doctrine  of  the  Sail.khya  philosophy
          ~ Vide  Alberuni's  India,  English  trans.  Vol.  I,  pp.  30  and  31,
          Trubner and Co. ).  With this independent evidence regarding the
          characteristic doctrine of the Sailkhyas before us, it would certainly
          be unreasonable to suppose that the doctrine was  not  mentioned
          in Sdnkhya-Karikas, as we shall  have to  do  if  the  noctrinal  part
          of the text is believed to  have originally contained  only  69 verses
          found  in the  existing  editions  of  the  Karikas.  Shvetdshvatara
           Upani~had vi.  1,  it may  be finally  mentioned,  expressly  refers  to
          Svabhdva,  Kala  and  Ishvara  as  the three  possible ulterior  causes
          of the  world  and  naturally  declares  the  last  one,  viz.,  Ishvara,
           as  being the real cause. The Satikhyas reject all  these  three,  and
          from  the  remaining  two,  Puru~ha  and  Prakriti,  reject  Puru~ha
            v. 6
   724   725   726   727   728   729   730   731   732   733   734