Page 92 - Konferensiya to'plami - 1 (ASR)
P. 92

existence  and  eternal  reality.  These  journey  metaphors  illustrate  how  Eliot's
            symbolism  became  increasingly  concerned  with  spiritual  transformation  and
            religious experience.
                  As noted by Uzbek literary scholar Hamidov, "Eliot's poetry demonstrates how
            traditional symbols can be reinvigorated through modernist techniques to address
            contemporary  spiritual  crises.  This  approach  has  significantly  influenced  the
            development of symbolism in twentieth-century Uzbek poetry" [8]. This observation
            highlights the global impact of Eliot's innovative use of metaphor and symbolism,
            extending beyond Western literary traditions to influence poetic developments in
            Central Asia and elsewhere.
                  The fragmentation that characterizes much of Eliot's poetry serves as both a
            stylistic  technique  and  a  powerful  metaphor  for  the  disintegration  of  modern
            civilization. In "The Waste Land," the disjointed structure—with its abrupt transitions
            between  voices,  languages,  and  literary  allusions—mirrors  the  fractured
            consciousness of post-war society. This formal fragmentation becomes symbolic of
            cultural  dissolution,  yet  paradoxically,  through  his  careful  arrangement  of  these
            fragments, Eliot suggests the possibility of creating meaning from chaos. The famous
            line "These fragments I have shored against my ruins" from the poem's final section
            encapsulates  this  dual  movement  of  acknowledging  fragmentation  while
            attempting to construct a coherent response to it.
                  Among the most haunting symbols in "The Waste Land" is the figure of Tiresias,
            the blind prophet from Greek mythology who has experienced life as both man and
            woman. Eliot positions Tiresias as the central consciousness of the poem, writing in
            his notes that "what Tiresias sees, in fact, is the substance of the poem." This mythical
            figure  becomes  a  symbol  of  universal  witness,  transcending  the  limitations  of
            individual perspective to observe the cyclical patterns of human folly and suffering
            across time. Through Tiresias, Eliot suggests that contemporary spiritual bankruptcy
            is not unprecedented but part of an ongoing historical pattern—a perspective that
            both  universalizes  modern  suffering  and  offers  the  possibility  that,  like  previous
            spiritual crises, it might eventually be overcome.
                  The symbolic landscape of "The Waste Land" also includes the "unreal city," a
            recurring image drawn from Baudelaire's "Les Sept Vieillards" but transformed by
            Eliot into a specifically modern hellscape. London becomes a contemporary inferno,
            populated by the spiritually dead who flow over London Bridge, "undone" by "death"
            yet paradoxically still moving through the motions of life. This spectral city serves as
            a  powerful  metaphor  for  modern  civilization  itself—superficially  functional  but
            spiritually  hollow.  The  image  recurs  throughout  Eliot's  poetry,  appearing  again  in
            "The Hollow Men" with its famous refrain, "This is the way the world ends / Not with a
            bang but a whimper," suggesting the spiritual exhaustion of modern society.
                  In "Ash Wednesday," Eliot develops a rich symbolic vocabulary to express his
            newfound religious faith. The poem's title refers to the Christian ritual marking the
            beginning  of  Lent,  symbolizing  penitence  and  spiritual  renewal.  Throughout  the
            poem,  the  "Lady"  figure  emerges  as  a  multivalent  symbol,  simultaneously
            representing the Virgin Mary, Dante's Beatrice, and the abstract principle of divine
            grace. This deliberate ambiguity allows the symbol to function on multiple levels—
            personal,  literary,  and  theological—reflecting  Eliot's  understanding  of  religious
            experience  as  both  deeply  individual  and  connected  to  cultural  and  spiritual              90
            traditions.


                                                                                                           I SHO‘BA:

                                                                                     Tilshunoslikning nazariy va amaliy masalalari

                                                                                         https://www.asr-conference.com/
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97