Page 17 - Journal of Management Inquiry, July 2018
P. 17

712670 JMIXXX10.1177/1056492617712670Journal of Management InquiryWright et al.
   research-article2017
           Reflections on Experience

                                                                                          Journal of Management Inquiry
                                                                                          Journal of Management Inquiry
           Further Thoughts on Kerr’s “Folly” and                                         2018, Vol. 27(3) 316 –324 –324
                                                                                          2018, Vol. 27(3) 316
                                                                                          © The Author(s) 2017
                                                                                          © The Author(s) 2017
                                                                                          Reprints and permissions:
           Repeat Offenses: Where We Are, Have                                            Reprints and permissions:
                                                                                          sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
                                                                                          sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav
                                                                                          DOI: 10.1177/1056492617712670
                                                                                          https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617712670
                                                                                          https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617712670
                                                                                          https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492617712670
           Been, and Are Going                                                            DOI: 10.1177/1056492617712670
                                                                                          journals.sagepub.com/home/jmi
                                                                                          jmi.sagepub.com
                                                                            1
                                1
                                                           2
           Thomas A. Wright , Richard W. Stackman , John Hollwitz ,
           and Arthur S. DeGroat     3
           Abstract
           Steve Kerr’s seminal “Folly” article astutely noted that all too many organizations—and the individuals who populate them—
           invariably violate a fundamental law of social nature by rewarding the very behaviors that they are supposedly trying to
           discourage, while failing to reward the behaviors they desire to reinforce. But as Kerr notes in his interview, it is simply more
           than a faulty reward system that has allowed these malfunctions to continue. Building upon Kerr’s insights, we offer two
           proposed “Folly” updates regarding how we can create better functioning organizations. First, we discuss the provocative
           option that there are only two, not four, causes to the “Folly.” Second, we offer the context of character as one explanation
           (and possible solution) for the fact that even after more than 40 years too many organizations remain frequent repeat “Folly”
           offenders.

           Keywords
           character, integrity, hypocrisy, moral motivation, psychopathy/sociopathy


             And what sort of lives do these people, who pose as being moral,   in nearly three-dozen countries. The bank had instituted an
             lead themselves?                                  “incentive compensation program” that measured and
                                                               rewarded its employees for establishing new bank and
             My dear fellow, you forget that we are in the native land of the   credit card accounts for its customers. Investigators discov-
             hypocrite.                                        ered that this simple performance management device led
                           —Oscar Wilde, The Picture of Dorian Gray  to the establishment of accounts—1.5 million bank accounts
                                                               and a half-million credit cards in the names of customers
           Even though Kerr’s classic “Folly” article has been assigned   who  had  not  actually  applied  for  them.  Some  of  these
           and, hopefully, read and assimilated by many of our busi-  involved fees that were passed on to customers, even
           ness students (and ourselves), we appear condemned to   though they had neither requested nor authorized the
           repeat the “Folly” on a seemingly continuous basis. Oscar   accounts in the first place.
           Wilde may well have been correct regarding the prevalence   Once discovered, the situation produced a great deal of
           of hypocrisy—not only in his, but in our current society as   reputational cost for Wells Fargo. It also generated substan-
           well. Building upon Kerr’s insightful interview published   tial material cost. By September 2016, the bank had been
           in the current issue of the Journal of Management Inquiry   assessed US$185 million dollars in fines, plus US$5 million
           (JMI), we engage the readership with several value-added   in funds set aside to reimburse customers who had been
           contributions designed to further help us put the “Folly” in   charged fees for accounts that they did not request (Corkery,
           context and stimulate further research on this fascinating   2016). Furthermore,  Wells Fargo terminated over 5,000
           topic.                                              employees and Standard and Poor’s downgraded the com-
             The recent scandal surrounding  Wells Fargo demon-  pany’s ratings.
           strates that the “Folly” remains alive and well, with ease of
           measurement  (both the  fascination with  objective and   1 Fordham University, Bronx, NY, USA
           highly visible behavior causes) and possibly hypocrisy con-  2 University of San Francisco, CA, USA
           tributing to practices that materially affected hundreds of   3 Kansas State University, Manhattan, USA
           thousands of their bank and credit card customers (Glazer,   Corresponding Author:
           2017). The 165-year-old Wells Fargo (founded March 18,   Thomas A. Wright, Fordham University, Bronx, NY 10458, USA.
           1852), a top Fortune 30 company, has 70 million customers   Email: twright17@fordham.edu
   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22