Page 27 - EdViewptsSpring2017
P. 27

planning period provided in their    Guiding the Drivers                  reviewed each meeting. We have a
        schedule, there was a lack of consis-                                     shared agenda which all participate in
        tency and a shared understanding of    Guiding the work of the leadership   adding to.
        the cycle of professional learning in   team was training provided by our   Our school safety team has taken
        which a successful PLC should be     NJPSA coach, Pat O’Keefe, a retired   on the challenge of working through
        engaged. Implementing full training in   administrator with a strong background   the culture and climate modules this
        PLC’s would be a difficult and expensive   in many areas. Our team met again in   year with the ultimate goal of creat-
        undertaking if it had been brought in as   the late spring at a training at NJPSA   ing a school climate plan by the end
        a district initiative in any other way.  that helped us to solidify our plans and   of the year. The culture and climate
                                             share ongoing work with other districts
        CAR uses the analogy of a trip to ex-  and schools in the pilot. Our coach   modules are an essential part of the
        plain all of the pieces of this systematic,   helped steer the entire grade level   CAR process. Without a commitment
        coherent plan to improve student learn-  leadership team with training right   to building and sustaining a strong,
        ing and strengthen educator practice.   after school ended in June. Our district   positive school culture, the PLC work
        It defines the destination as student   superintendent, Dr. Brian Zychowski,   cannot be fully successful.
        learning, with the PLC as the vehicle   and curriculum director, Ms. Jennifer
        that can help schools achieve that learn-  Diszler, supported our work by pro-  Navigating Through Rough
        ing. CAR defines the map to get there   viding our team with these two paid   Terrain
        as a viable curriculum composed of   training days. Over the summer,      Initially, as we started our work in the
        units of study containing basic compo-  these grade level leaders were able   online Moodle, many of us found it a bit
        nents of effective practice. The drivers   to explore the online courses and   confusing. As a staff comfortable with
        on this journey are teachers and ad-  become more familiar with the work   technology, we had all started viewing
        ministrators. Along the journey are the   in which they would be leading their   the videos and conversations WITHOUT
        guideposts or assessments that the   grade level teams.                   viewing the Orientation Tools for using
        teams create to guide their travels. The                                  the Online Courses and the Moodle.
        culture of the school, made up of climate   Participation in the CAR      The Orientation tools ended up being
        (student to student, adult to student,
        and adult to adult,) shared leadership,  process helps the PLC            an essential piece to understanding the
        communication and expectations is the   teams develop shared              structure of the courses. There are an
                                                                                  incredible amount of resources available
        terrain encountered along the journey.                                    through the Blended Online Learning
        The PLC teams of teachers develop,   leadership and create                Modules (also known as BOLM), and
        implement, reflect on, and continuously   group norms and struc-          it is important for teams to understand
        revise standards-based curriculum units,   tures that allow them          how to move through the content of the
        various formative and summative com-                                      courses. Courses 1, 2, and 3 should be
        mon assessments, PLC practice, and   to be more effective and             approached sequentially.
        culture. Participation in the CAR process   focused in their work,
        helps the PLC teams develop shared                                        Our administrative team provided sup-
        leadership and create group norms and  to continually drive in-           port to our grade level leaders in their
        structures that allow them to be more   struction based on stu-           roll out by being available to listen and
        effective and focused in their work, to   dent needs.                     troubleshoot challenges. We used our
        continually drive instruction based on                                    grade level leader meetings as a forum
        student needs.                                                            to share successes and challenges and
                                             Setting the Course                   showcase the unit work being done.
        Planning the Trip                    In August, our Leadership Team met   However, it was also important to al-

        The initial planning for our school’s   again prior to the start of school to plan   low each PLC autonomy in their work.
        participation in the pilot took place dur-  the roll out with the teachers at their   Some teams worried that with their
        ing the application process. However,   PLC’s. We discussed common training,   focus now on watching the videos and
        like any other initiative, this one adapted   explanations, and introductions to the   participating in the conversations left
        and changed over time. Keeping in mind  CAR framework that would be shared   them little time to focus on planning that
        change theory and the need to plan   with all staff at the first faculty meeting   they were used to. The message was
        out implementation, our original ideas   of the year. As principal, it was my role   to stay the course and continue to work
        adjusted once the initial training session   to provide the vision for the year’s work   through the conversations, even if the
        was complete and more team members   at this meeting. We discussed which   were only able to carve out 20 minutes
        were fully engaged in the planning. It   videos and conversations in the Moodle   of PLC time for it.
        was difficult in mid-year to shift from   we would begin with, as a full staff and   Once teams have completed courses
        ongoing initiatives and add something   on grade-level teams. We scheduled   1-3 and have been through the full cycle
        new. Instead, we laid the groundwork for   regular monthly grade-level leader   of creating and implementing a unit with
        the CAR process by sharing informa-  meetings, and we followed the CAR    CAR, we envision that the time spent in
        tion with staff at faculty meetings to let   framework for our leadership work as   their PLC’s will be much more focused
        staff know this was on the horizon for all   well: creating common group norms,   on the learned cycle of professional
        classroom staff in September of 2016.   which are posted where we meet and   learning and the BOLM will become
                                            Educational Viewpoints       -25-       Spring 2017
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32