Page 80 - EdViewptsSpring2017
P. 80

Creating a Grant-Writing


        Culture in Your District




        By Nancy Lubarsky, Ed.D., Superintendent, Mountainside










































        In the past five years,              minimal and outdated technologies.   grants because the main disqualifier
        Mountainside (a small, suburban, K-8   These circumstances are not unusual.   is often socio-economic. Second, who
        district in Union County) received al-  Although people think of small, subur-  would write the grants? Small districts
        most half a million dollars in grants    ban towns as affluent, their resources   have limited administrative personnel,
        and donations. Much of this money    are also limited. These districts receive  already wearing many hats. Hiring
        was obtained through teacher efforts.   significantly less state aid. There are   grant writers is costly.
        We now have more books in class-     fewer homes and less commercial en-  I decided to take the plunge. Moun-
        rooms, more curriculum related assem-  terprises from which to develop a tax   tainside has an Education Foundation
        blies, and more field trips. Of course,   base, and yet they still must provide   (MEF) and a private foundation (Watts),
        this didn’t happen overnight. Not only   the same services and support the   but both their primary missions were
        were teachers trained to write grants,   same infrastructure as larger districts.   the arts. Neither had ever given large
        but we convinced them that their time   Generous parents came to our board   scale funds to our district. I had to
        and effort would directly impact their   meetings, concerned about the lack   convince them in my proposals that
        students, classrooms, and teaching.  of technology, wanting to donate, but   our greatest need, technology, was
        When I taught English in a small, ur-  we had no system in place. Would   key to supporting the arts across the
        ban district, there were few resources.    their donations stay in the classroom   curriculum. It worked! We received
        I wrote grants out of necessity for   or follow their children? How could   substantial donations from both orga-
        classroom materials, field trips, and   we insure equal distribution? Par-  nizations to begin to build our technol-
        guest speakers. Years later, when I   ents suggested applying for grants.   ogy program. Once we achieved these
        arrived as superintendent in Moun-   I already knew, however, that there   successes, I asked other local orga-
        tainside (a district of less than 800   were two key obstacles. The first was   nizations (the Elks and the Rotary)
        students), surprisingly I found similar   that suburban districts aren’t eligible   to also support our technology. They
        budgetary issues, especially regarding   for many public, private, or corporate   were happy to donate to our efforts.


                                            Educational Viewpoints       -78-       Spring 2017
   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85