Page 27 - East Campus RFQ 2.14.2017
P. 27

27







                                            Role that the Master Developer should play in facilitating private development and the role of outside
                                              consultants, as needed (expenses related to outside consultants will be the sole responsibility of the
                                              Master Developer); and,
                                            Ideas and concerns regarding ULI recommendations and conceptual site plan.

                                          E.  Community Relations Plan
                                          Respondents should identify how good relations with all involved parties (including the University, ANCs,
                                          District  of  Columbia  Government,  and  surrounding  community)  will  be  maintained  throughout  the
                                          duration  of  the  Project.  The  Master  Developer  will  be  required  to  coordinate  with  various  University
                                          stakeholders including, but not limited to, the Office of External Affairs and Howard School of Divinity
                                          Board  of  Visitors.  Respondents  should  identify  local  market  knowledge  and  a  community  relations
                                          strategy  applicable  to  the  District  of  Columbia.  Respondents  should  commit  to  coordinating  their
                                          outreach efforts with the University’s community representative.

                                          Previous  community  relations  experience  should  be  identified,  including  any  relationships  with
                                          governmental entities or community organizations on similar projects. In particular, discuss any projects
                                          that were executed on public or university land.
                                          F. Pricing Structure

                                          Respondents  are  required  to  develop  pricing  models  for  Phases  1  and  2  of  the  Scope  of  Work  and  to
                                          outline  all  costs  associated  with  due  diligence,  community  engagement,  and  the  overall  development
                                          plan. For Phase 3, Respondents should describe a high level framework and approach for allocating value
                                          to Howard during implementation of approved ECRP.
                                          Phases 1 and 2: Must submit a Firm Fixed Price cost proposal fully supported by pricing data adequate to
                                          establish the reasonableness of the proposed fee. The following information should be submitted as part
                                          of the business proposal:

                                          a)  Respondents must provide estimated labor hours and total price breakdown for each sequential step
                                              described in Section D;

                                          b)  Respondents must provide fully loaded labor rates for each person proposed in the proposal;
                                          c)  Travel costs, if any, supported by a breakdown including origin, duration, frequency, and purpose;
                                              and
                                          d)  Breakdown of other expenses such as printing, copying, other clerical services, etc.


                                          CAUTION: Failure to provide breakdown of cost elements may render a proposal non-responsive.
   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32