Page 28 - East Campus RFQ 2.14.2017
P. 28

28






         G. General Requirements
         Respondents interested in the Project should provide straightforward, concise information that satisfies
         the requirements noted below. Brevity is appreciated and all proposals should conform to the following
         requirements:

           Four hard copies and one electronic copy must be submitted. Hard copies should be prepared on 8.5 x
            11-inch paper, though oversized drawings may be folded into an 8.5 x 11 size;
           Text portions of the electronic copy of the proposal must be in a searchable format;
           All  financial  information  (including  budgets)  included  within  a  proposal  must  be  submitted  in
            Microsoft Excel with fully functional formulas;
           Any submitted proposal shall remain a valid proposal for 18 months after the proposal due date;
           All documentation submitted with the proposal should be contained in a single volume;
           Typeface shall be no smaller than 11 point and margins shall be no less than one inch; and,
           Expensive bindings, color displays and the like are not necessary.

         Proposal should follow the format below and should not exceed the following page limitations:
                                                         PAGE LIMIT

         Cover Letter                                    One (1) page

         Team Qualifications                             Ten (10) pages

         Financial Capability                            Five (5) pages

         Project Approach                                Ten (15) pages

         Community Relations Plan                        Four (4) pages

         Pricing Structure                               Five (5) pages
         Appendices (Resumes and relevant information
         not required in the sections above)             No page limitation


         Proposals that do not include all of the information required in this section may not receive consideration
         under this RFQ. The determination as to whether or not a proposal is responsive is at the sole discretion of
         the  University.  Respondents  may  wish  to  explain  any  omitted  or  unaddressed  information;  provided,
         however, that any failure to address completely the requirements of the proposal may be grounds for
         disqualification  of  a  proposal  and  an  explanation  alone  will  not  be  deemed  a  substitute  for  failure  to
         submit information. Proposals received after the deadline will not be reviewed.
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33