Page 58 - SAPEM-Chapter-10-2nd-edition-2014
P. 58

South African Pavement Engineering Manual
                                              Chapter 10:  Pavement Design

              Detailed project specific traffic surveys are not necessary for Category C and D projects, and replaced with a visual
              observation of the traffic and vehicle loading characteristics.  For Categories A and B, it is recommended that either a
              7 day count with limited static weighing, or a full 7 day axle load survey is done.  Figure 25, from the SADC Low-
              volume Sealed Roads Guideline, shows the effect of the count duration on the error in the traffic estimates.
































                             Figure 25.  Effect of Counting Duration on Accuracy of Results

              A particularly difficult problem is the design of a green fields project, where traffic data cannot be collected.  In such
              cases, only published results or transportation planning models can be used.  The preferred option is a transportation
              planning model, done by a transportation engineer.

              4.6.1 Published Results
              When using published results, the traffic conditions must be the same.  To check this, compare the loading per heavy
              vehicle, the type/classes of heavy vehicles operating on the road, or using a stratification system.

              When  published  results  or  those  measured  on  other  roads  are  used,  TRH16  warns  that  significant  errors  in  the
              design traffic estimate can result.  This technique  should therefore only  be applied to Category C and D roads
              carrying little  traffic (less than ES0.3).  In such situations, a basic traffic count significantly enhances  the design
              traffic estimation.

              A stratification system classifies routes based on the function of the route, in addition to the characteristic of the
              heavy vehicles.  A simple system considers the proportion of 2-axle heavy vehicles in the total heavy vehicle traffic
              spectrum as an indicator of the type of route  (Bosman, 1989 and 2004).  TRH16 lists the E80/HV based on the
              original  work  by  Bosman.    However,  given  the  influence  of  the  1996  increase  in  legal  axle  load  limits  and  the
              influence  of  the  level  of  overloading  control,  those  E80/HV  values
              may be too low.   It is therefore recommended  that the E80/HV
              values  listed  in  Table  18  for  the  short-medium-long  heavy  vehicle
              classification, considering the level of overloading control and the   TRH16 E80/HV Values
              proportion of short heavy vehicles,  are  used.    Because of the   The TRH16 (1991) recommended values
              general  lack  of  E80/HV  growth  data  it  is  recommended  that  the   for the E80/HV and the growth rate were
              growth  rates  in  Table  18  are  also  used.    In  general,  TRH16  is   determined before the 1996 increase in
              outdated, and needs updating.                             the legal axle load, and do not consider

                                                                        the level of overloading control.
                                                                        It is therefore recommended that the
                                                                        values given in Table 18 are used for
                                                                        E80/HV and the growth rates.


                                              Section 4:  Design Traffic Estimation
                                                         Page 47
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63