Page 161 - rise 2017
P. 161

Meanwhile,  Bank  Islam  Malaysia  reported  that  some  70-80  percent  of  the  bank’s  trade  and
             corporate  financing  are  with  non-Muslim  clients  (Ngui,  2004).  Deloitte  Touche  Tohmatsu  Malaysia
             reported  that  70  percent  of  Islamic  banks  financing  in  Malaysia  was  contributed  by  non-Muslim
             customers  (Saifuddin,  2003). Previous  study  has  shown  that  both Muslim and non-Muslim  customers
             have a good understanding of products and services offered by Islamic banks in Malaysia (Amin and Isa,
             2008), and that Islamic banks in Malaysia are accepted by both customer groups. Thus, Islamic banking
             is not merely of interest to Muslim customers but clearly non-Muslims customers see benefits from such
             a system.
                 Just like other service industries, most of studies consider delivering quality services as an essential
             strategy  for  success  and  survival  for  any  including  Islamic  banking  institutions.  That  is  why  Islamic
             banks put more in the effort to position their salient features in line with customer needs, which requires
             them to monitor customer preferences for their investments and borrowing options closely so as to design
             appropriate business strategies (Chong and Liu, 2006). In order to compete, Islamic banks probably need
             to  develop  effective  marketing  strategies,  upgrade  their  technological  capabilities  and  develop  their
             human resources. In particular, there is a need for Islamic banks to develop and maintain better service
             quality and customer satisfaction. The remainder of this paper proceeds with next section presenting a
             detailed literature review. The second part of the study discusses the methodology of the study in detail,
             with third section of the paper outlining results and discussions and the final section drawing conclusion
             of this study.

             Literature review
             Service Quality
             Service is kind of performance that is offered by one party to another and in corporeality is a must part of
             it (Kotler & Keller, 2006). Services are defined by some characteristics like services are incorporeal in
             nature; we cannot measure the service by some instrument. Services are said to be inseparable that is
             production  and  consumption  usually  takes  place  at  the  same  time.  Moreover,  services  are  variable  in
             nature; they don’t follow a same or some kind of linear pattern. Gronroos (2000) defined service as, “A
             service  is  a  process  consisting  of  a  series  of  more  or  less  intangible  activities  that  normally,  but  not
             necessarily  always,  take  place  in  interactions  between  the  customer  and  service  employees  and/or
             physical  resources  or  goods  and/  or  systems  of  service  provider,  which  are  provided  as  solutions  to
             customer problems”. Very often polymorphism is also seen in services as services are simple as well as
             complex. (Ograjenˇsek, 2008).
                  Quality consists of two primary elements which are first, either a product satisfies the needs or
             second,  up  to  which  level  it  is  free  from  deficiencies  (Juran,  1988).  Quality  spells  superiority  or
             excellence (Taylor and Baker, 1994) (Zeithaml, 1988), or, as the consumer’s overall impression of the
             relative  inferiority  or  superiority  of  the  organization  and  its  services  (Bitner  and  Hubbert,  1994;
             Keiningham et al., 1994-1995).
                   Service quality is defined as the outcomes of the customer’s overall evaluation of the differences
             between service  expectations and the actual service performance (Othman, A. & Owen, L. 2002). To
             some,  service  quality  can  also  be  defined  as  the  difference  between  customer’s  expectations  for  the
             service encounter and the perceptions of the service received. Fogli (2006) defined term service quality
             as “a global judgment or attitude relating to particular service; the customer’s overall impression of the
             relative inferiority or superiority of the organization and its services”.  According to the service quality
             theory (Oliver, 1980), it is predicted that customers will judge that quality as ‘low’ if performance does
             not  meet  their  expectations  and  quality  as  `high`  when  performance  exceeds  expectations.  Therefore,
             service quality is conceptualized as a multidimensional construct consisting of five dimensions (Othman,
             A. & Owen, L. 2002).
                  A quantitative research was arranged by Parasuraman et al in 1988 in which an instrument was
             developed for measuring the perception of consumers regarding service quality and after that research it
             became known as SERVQUAL. The dimensions of SERVQUAL model were:
             (1)  Tangibles:  the  physical  surroundings  represented  by  objects  (for  example,  interior  design)  and
             subjects (for example, the appearance of employees). (2) Reliability:   the   service   provider’s   ability to
             provide accurate and dependable services. (3) Responsiveness: a firm’s willingness to assist its customers
             by  providing  fast  and  efficient  service  performances.  (4)  Assurance:  diverse  features  that  provide
             confidence to customers (such as the firm’s specific service knowledge, polite and trustworthy behavior
   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166